public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tomas Pilar (tpilar)" <tpilar@solarflare.com>
To: "Zhu, Yonghong" <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>,
	"Carsey, Jaben" <jaben.carsey@intel.com>,
	"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BaseTools: Allow multiple PciDeviceId in Fdf OptionROM override
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 11:15:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4d0506c-2b2a-973a-8dca-3319057dd3e6@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B9726D6DCCFB8B4CA276A9169B02216D5213E94F@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Sorry, was travelling to plugfest. Respinning patches now.

Cheers,
Tom

On 12/10/2018 06:53, Zhu, Yonghong wrote:
> Hi Pilar,
>
> Will you update a V2 to cover Jaben's comment ?
>
> Best Regards,
> Zhu Yonghong
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Carsey, Jaben
> Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 11:00 PM
> To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Tomas Pilar (tpilar) <tpilar@solarflare.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] BaseTools: Allow multiple PciDeviceId in Fdf OptionROM override
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of 
>> Gao, Liming
>> Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2018 6:42 PM
>> To: Tomas Pilar (tpilar) <tpilar@solarflare.com>; 
>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] BaseTools: Allow multiple PciDeviceId in 
>> Fdf OptionROM override
>>
>> Pilar:
>>   The change is good. Could you also update INF and FDF spec for this usage?
>> If you don't know how to update INF and FDF spec, please submit BZ. I 
>> will provide the spec patch.
>>
>>   Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Liming
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf 
>>> Of Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 10:46 PM
>>> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] BaseTools: Allow multiple PciDeviceId in Fdf 
>>> OptionROM override
>>>
>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>>> Signed-off-by: Tomas Pilar <tpilar@solarflare.com>
>>> ---
>>> BaseTools/Source/Python/GenFds/FdfParser.py | 11 ++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/Python/GenFds/FdfParser.py
>>> b/BaseTools/Source/Python/GenFds/FdfParser.py
>>> index 63687e98bb..a65f2cfd2d 100644
>>> --- a/BaseTools/Source/Python/GenFds/FdfParser.py
>>> +++ b/BaseTools/Source/Python/GenFds/FdfParser.py
>>> @@ -4469,10 +4469,15 @@ class FdfParser:
>>>                 if self.__IsKeyword( "PCI_DEVICE_ID"):
>>>                     if not self.__IsToken( "="):
>>>                         raise Warning("expected '='", self.FileName,
>>> self.CurrentLineNumber)
>>> -                    if not self.__GetNextHexNumber():
>>> -                        raise Warning("expected Hex device id", self.FileName,
>>> self.CurrentLineNumber)
>>>
>>> -                    Overrides.PciDeviceId = self.__Token
>>> +                    # Get a list of PCI IDs
>>> +                    Overrides.PciDeviceId = ""
>>> +
>>> +                    while self.__GetNextHexNumber():
>>> +                        Overrides.PciDeviceId += " " + self.__Token
> Can we change to minimize looping string concatenation here?  This in a loop will cause lots of memory allocation/deallocation and slow things down.
>
> Maybe : 
> Overrides.PciDeviceId = "{} {}".format(Overrides.PciDeviceId, self.__Token)
>
>
>>> +
>>> +                    if not Overrides.PciDeviceId:
>>> +                        raise Warning("expected one or more Hex 
>>> + device ids",
>>> self.FileName, self.CurrentLineNumber)
>>>                     continue
>>>
>>>                 if self.__IsKeyword( "PCI_REVISION"):
>>> --
>>> 2.17.1
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> edk2-devel mailing list
>>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> edk2-devel mailing list
>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel



      reply	other threads:[~2018-10-24 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-02 14:46 [PATCH] BaseTools: Allow multiple PciDeviceId in Fdf OptionROM override Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2018-10-02 14:52 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-10-08  1:41 ` Gao, Liming
2018-10-08 15:00   ` Carsey, Jaben
2018-10-12  5:53     ` Zhu, Yonghong
2018-10-24 10:15       ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e4d0506c-2b2a-973a-8dca-3319057dd3e6@solarflare.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox