From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, yuanhao.xie@intel.com
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>, Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>,
Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch V2 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Eliminate redundant microcode loading in DXE.
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 18:24:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e72821a0-bdbf-379e-664e-d746484e84a6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231121073956.2741-4-yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
On 11/21/23 08:39, Yuanhao Xie wrote:
> The DXE stage's Microcode loading process has been elimincated by:
>
> 1. Microcode HOB consumption in MP initialization within the DXE phase.
> 2. Restricting MicrocodeDetect to the PEI phase instead of DXE for BSP.
> 3. BSP now WakeUpAp only for synchronizing MTRR settings, with
> Microcode loading no longer a part of this process.
>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
> ---
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> index bb5d4188f0..0cf3520f9e 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> @@ -434,7 +434,27 @@ ApFuncEnableX2Apic (
> }
>
> /**
> - Do sync on APs.
> + Sync BSP's MTRR table to AP during waking up APs.
> + @param[in, out] Buffer Pointer to private data buffer.
> +**/
> +VOID
> +EFIAPI
> +ApMtrrSync (
> + IN OUT VOID *Buffer
> + )
> +{
> + CPU_MP_DATA *CpuMpData;
> +
> + CpuMpData = (CPU_MP_DATA *)Buffer;
> +
> + //
> + // Sync BSP's MTRR table to AP
> + //
> + MtrrSetAllMtrrs (&CpuMpData->MtrrTable);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + Do sync on APs, includes loading microcode, and sync MTRRs.
>
> @param[in, out] Buffer Pointer to private data buffer.
> **/
> @@ -2224,26 +2244,10 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
> }
> }
>
> - if (!GetMicrocodePatchInfoFromHob (
> - &CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchAddress,
> - &CpuMpData->MicrocodePatchRegionSize
> - ))
> - {
> - //
> - // The microcode patch information cache HOB does not exist, which means
> - // the microcode patches data has not been loaded into memory yet
> - //
> - ShadowMicrocodeUpdatePatch (CpuMpData);
> - }
> -
(1) This patch seems great, functionally speaking, but I *think* the
above part (the elimination of the GetMicrocodePatchInfoFromHob() call,
and the dependent ShadowMicrocodeUpdatePatch() call) should be split to
a separate patch -- perhaps before, perhaps after, the rest of this
patch, in the series.
That's because the GetMicrocodePatchInfoFromHob() and
ShadowMicrocodeUpdatePatch() calls are removed *altogether* from the
code in this patch; they are not *moved* to any of the branches below.
Which makes me think that *even without* restricting the
MicrocodeDetect() call below (and calling ApMtrrSync() on the other
branch below), the HOB stuff is just generally superfluous.
- If that's the case, then please split this part out to a new patch in
v3. (Please also don't forget to update the commit message here!) With
that, you can add
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
to what *remains* from this patch. (I.e. everything except the
GetMicrocodePatchInfoFromHob/ShadowMicrocodeUpdatePatch removal.)
- If I'm wrong, and the GetMicrocodePatchInfoFromHob /
ShadowMicrocodeUpdatePatch removal is an integral part of this patch (if
it cannot be separated, semantically), then I don't understand something
about this patch. But in that case I'd like you to explain the reason
for removing these function calls right in this patch. I might reply
with an R-b to that explanation. (Although I'd probably request that the
explanation be included in the commit message, in v3.)
Thanks!
Laszlo
> //
> - // Wakeup APs to do some AP initialize sync (Microcode & MTRR)
> + // Wakeup APs to do some AP initialize sync.
> //
> if (CpuMpData->CpuCount > 1) {
> - //
> - // Detect and apply Microcode on BSP
> - //
> - MicrocodeDetect (CpuMpData, CpuMpData->BspNumber);
> //
> // Store BSP's MTRR setting
> //
> @@ -2256,8 +2260,20 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
> // in DXE.
> //
> CpuMpData->InitFlag = ApInitReconfig;
> - WakeUpAP (CpuMpData, TRUE, 0, ApInitializeSync, CpuMpData, TRUE);
> + //
> + // Wakeup APs to sync MTRR settings.
> + // For the case the PEI and DXE are in different bit mode.
> + // It is necessary to do the MTRRs syncing.
> + //
> + WakeUpAP (CpuMpData, TRUE, 0, ApMtrrSync, CpuMpData, TRUE);
> } else {
> + //
> + // Detect and apply Microcode on BSP
> + //
> + MicrocodeDetect (CpuMpData, CpuMpData->BspNumber);
> + //
> + // Wakeup APs to do some AP initialize sync load microcode and Sync MTRRs
> + //
> WakeUpAP (CpuMpData, TRUE, 0, ApInitializeSync, CpuMpData, TRUE);
> }
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#111621): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/111621
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/102724548/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/12367111/7686176/1913456212/xyzzy [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-22 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-21 7:39 [edk2-devel] [Patch V2 0/3] Eliminate redundant microcode loading in DXE Yuanhao Xie
2023-11-21 7:39 ` [edk2-devel] [Patch V2 1/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib:Repeat WakeUpAp of loading microcode,Syncing MTRR Yuanhao Xie
2023-11-21 7:58 ` Ni, Ray
2023-11-22 16:58 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-21 7:39 ` [edk2-devel] [Patch V2 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Detect microcode and store MTRR when CpuCount > 1 Yuanhao Xie
2023-11-22 17:03 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-22 17:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-22 17:11 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-21 7:39 ` [edk2-devel] [Patch V2 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Eliminate redundant microcode loading in DXE Yuanhao Xie
2023-11-22 17:24 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2023-11-24 2:58 ` Yuanhao Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e72821a0-bdbf-379e-664e-d746484e84a6@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox