public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: clean up PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT usage.
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:25:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7d70771-66da-18b1-49f4-f39ba6790798@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190911014511.9356-1-eric.dong@intel.com>

On 09/11/19 03:45, Eric Dong wrote:
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1039
> 
> Current implementation not checks system mode before using
> PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT.ContextData.X64 or
> PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT.ContextData.Ia32. This patch check
> the mode before using the correct one.
> 
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> ---
>  UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuPageTable.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuPageTable.c b/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuPageTable.c
> index ec5cd424fc..308f93b1cd 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuPageTable.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuPageTable.c
> @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ GetCurrentPagingContext (
>    MSR_IA32_EFER_REGISTER          MsrEfer;
>    IA32_CR4                        Cr4;
>    IA32_CR0                        Cr0;
> +  UINT32                          *Attributes;
> +  UINTN                           *PageTableBase;
>  
>    //
>    // Don't retrieve current paging context from processor if in SMM mode.
> @@ -163,29 +165,33 @@ GetCurrentPagingContext (
>      ZeroMem (&mPagingContext, sizeof(mPagingContext));
>      if (sizeof(UINTN) == sizeof(UINT64)) {
>        mPagingContext.MachineType = IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_X64;
> +      Attributes = &mPagingContext.ContextData.X64.Attributes;
> +      PageTableBase = &mPagingContext.ContextData.X64.PageTableBase;
>      } else {
>        mPagingContext.MachineType = IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_I386;
> +      Attributes = &mPagingContext.ContextData.Ia32.Attributes;
> +      PageTableBase = (UINTN *)&mPagingContext.ContextData.Ia32.PageTableBase;

(1) This is quite unfortunate. I don't like the cast.

I understand why it is used here -- when we build for X64, then UINTN is
UINT64, and so PageTableBase points to a UINT64. But
"mPagingContext.ContextData.Ia32.PageTableBase" is a UINT32, so the
compiler will complain about the incompatible pointer assignment.
Therefore you use an explicit cast -- which would be wrong, if the code
ever ran, but then again, that code will never run.

I don't like this trick.

Furthermore, the same issue will exist on the *other* branch, if you
build the present code for IA32 -- you didn't use a cast there. When
building for IA32, PageTableBase points to a UINT32. But, on the first
branch, "mPagingContext.ContextData.X64.PageTableBase" is a UINT64.
Therefore, the compiler will warn the same (although the code will never
run).

Did you build the patch for IA32?


I think there are two ways to fix this.

(1a) The ugly (but correct) fix is to use "#ifdef MDE_CPU_IA32" and
"#ifdef MDE_CPU_X64" directives, and *no* casts. In other words, we
should never compile the code that we won't run.

(1b) The nice (and also correct) fix is to introduce a helper function:

VOID
GetPagingDetails (
  IN  PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_DATA *PagingContextData,
  OUT UINTN                              **PageTableBase     OPTIONAL,
  OUT UINT32                             **Attributes        OPTIONAL
  );

There would be two implementations:

- IA32 subdirectory:

  if (PageTableBase != NULL) {
    *PageTableBase = &PagingContextData->Ia32.PageTableBase;
  }
  if (Attributes != NULL) {
    *Attributes = &PagingContextData->Ia32.Attributes;
  }

- X64 subdirectory:

  if (PageTableBase != NULL) {
    *PageTableBase = &PagingContextData->X64.PageTableBase;
  }
  if (Attributes != NULL) {
    *Attributes = &PagingContextData->X64.Attributes;
  }

And here we'd do

  GetPagingDetails (
    &mPagingContext.ContextData,
    &PageTableBase,
    &Attributes
    );

and the rest of the GetCurrentPagingContext() updates would be the same.


>      }
>  
>      Cr0.UintN = AsmReadCr0 ();
>      Cr4.UintN = AsmReadCr4 ();
>  
>      if (Cr0.Bits.PG != 0) {
> -      mPagingContext.ContextData.X64.PageTableBase = (AsmReadCr3 () & PAGING_4K_ADDRESS_MASK_64);
> +      *PageTableBase = (AsmReadCr3 () & PAGING_4K_ADDRESS_MASK_64);
>      } else {
> -      mPagingContext.ContextData.X64.PageTableBase = 0;
> +      *PageTableBase = 0;
>      }
>      if (Cr0.Bits.WP  != 0) {
> -      mPagingContext.ContextData.Ia32.Attributes |= PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_WP_ENABLE;
> +      *Attributes |= PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_WP_ENABLE;
>      }
>      if (Cr4.Bits.PSE != 0) {
> -      mPagingContext.ContextData.Ia32.Attributes |= PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_PSE;
> +      *Attributes |= PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_PSE;
>      }
>      if (Cr4.Bits.PAE != 0) {
> -      mPagingContext.ContextData.Ia32.Attributes |= PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_PAE;
> +      *Attributes |= PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_PAE;
>      }
>      if (Cr4.Bits.LA57 != 0) {
> -      mPagingContext.ContextData.Ia32.Attributes |= PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_5_LEVEL;
> +      *Attributes |= PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_5_LEVEL;
>      }
>  
>      AsmCpuid (CPUID_EXTENDED_FUNCTION, &RegEax, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> @@ -197,12 +203,12 @@ GetCurrentPagingContext (
>          MsrEfer.Uint64 = AsmReadMsr64(MSR_CORE_IA32_EFER);
>          if (MsrEfer.Bits.NXE != 0) {
>            // XD activated
> -          mPagingContext.ContextData.Ia32.Attributes |= PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_XD_ACTIVATED;
> +          *Attributes |= PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_XD_ACTIVATED;
>          }
>        }
>  
>        if (RegEdx.Bits.Page1GB != 0) {
> -        mPagingContext.ContextData.Ia32.Attributes |= PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_PAGE_1G_SUPPORT;
> +        *Attributes |= PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_PAGE_1G_SUPPORT;
>        }
>      }
>    }
> @@ -395,6 +401,7 @@ ConvertPageEntryAttribute (
>  {
>    UINT64  CurrentPageEntry;
>    UINT64  NewPageEntry;
> +  UINT32  *PageAttributes;
>  
>    CurrentPageEntry = *PageEntry;
>    NewPageEntry = CurrentPageEntry;
> @@ -438,7 +445,13 @@ ConvertPageEntryAttribute (
>        break;
>      }
>    }
> -  if ((PagingContext->ContextData.Ia32.Attributes & PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_XD_ACTIVATED) != 0) {
> +
> +  if (PagingContext->MachineType == IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_X64) {
> +    PageAttributes = &PagingContext->ContextData.X64.Attributes;
> +  } else {
> +    PageAttributes = &PagingContext->ContextData.Ia32.Attributes;
> +  }

(2) So here we'd write

  GetPagingDetails (
    &PagingContext->ContextData,
    NULL,
    &PageAttributes
    );

> +  if ((*PageAttributes & PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_XD_ACTIVATED) != 0) {
>      if ((Attributes & EFI_MEMORY_XP) != 0) {
>        switch (PageAction) {
>        case PageActionAssign:
> @@ -1338,15 +1351,24 @@ InitializePageTableLib (
>    )
>  {
>    PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT     CurrentPagingContext;
> +  UINT32                            *Attributes;
> +  UINTN                             *PageTableBase;
>  
>    GetCurrentPagingContext (&CurrentPagingContext);
>  
> +  if (CurrentPagingContext.MachineType == IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_X64) {
> +    Attributes = &CurrentPagingContext.ContextData.X64.Attributes;
> +    PageTableBase = &CurrentPagingContext.ContextData.X64.PageTableBase;
> +  } else {
> +    Attributes = &CurrentPagingContext.ContextData.Ia32.Attributes;
> +    PageTableBase = (UINTN *)&CurrentPagingContext.ContextData.Ia32.PageTableBase;
> +  }
> +

(3) This would become

  GetPagingDetails (
    &CurrentPagingContext.ContextData,
    &PageTableBase,
    &Attributes
    );

>    //
>    // Reserve memory of page tables for future uses, if paging is enabled.
>    //
> -  if (CurrentPagingContext.ContextData.X64.PageTableBase != 0 &&
> -      (CurrentPagingContext.ContextData.Ia32.Attributes &
> -       PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_PAE) != 0) {
> +  if ((*PageTableBase != 0) &&
> +      (*Attributes & PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT_IA32_X64_ATTRIBUTES_PAE) != 0) {
>      DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect ();
>      InitializePageTablePool (1);
>      EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect ();
> @@ -1361,10 +1383,10 @@ InitializePageTableLib (
>      ASSERT (mLastPFEntryPointer != NULL);
>    }
>  
> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "CurrentPagingContext:\n", CurrentPagingContext.MachineType));
> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "CurrentPagingContext:\n"));
>    DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "  MachineType   - 0x%x\n", CurrentPagingContext.MachineType));
> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "  PageTableBase - 0x%x\n", CurrentPagingContext.ContextData.X64.PageTableBase));
> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "  Attributes    - 0x%x\n", CurrentPagingContext.ContextData.X64.Attributes));
> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "  PageTableBase - 0x%x\n", *PageTableBase));

(4) UINTN values should be cast to UINT64 explicitly, and printed with
"%Lx":

  DEBUG ((
    DEBUG_INFO,
    "  PageTableBase - 0x%Lx\n",
    (UINT64)*PageTableBase
    ));

Thanks
Laszlo

> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "  Attributes    - 0x%x\n", *Attributes));
>  
>    return ;
>  }
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-11 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-11  1:45 [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: clean up PAGE_TABLE_LIB_PAGING_CONTEXT usage Dong, Eric
2019-09-11 15:25 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-09-12  2:54   ` Dong, Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7d70771-66da-18b1-49f4-f39ba6790798@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox