From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38A1E1A1EEF for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 14:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F6D3D946; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 21:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-116-104.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.104]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u95LI8e1001170; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 17:18:09 -0400 To: Andrew Fish , Daniil Egranov References: <93F01BC9-4B02-467E-B900-65C6775BB0F3@apple.com> <6ac805ec-66c2-a291-7852-3429efa018cd@arm.com> <9F98A80B-A3F4-4956-9D84-33C166384EB6@apple.com> Cc: "Carsey, Jaben" , edk2-devel-01 , Leif Lindholm From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 23:18:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9F98A80B-A3F4-4956-9D84-33C166384EB6@apple.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Wed, 05 Oct 2016 21:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Assert in ShellPkg with latest tianocore edk2 source on the Reference Platform X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 21:18:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/05/16 23:05, Andrew Fish wrote: > I'm guessing that your DXE Driver is dispatching prior UEFI Driver that publishes the protocol. BTW... Why is EnglishDxe a UEFI_DRIVER rather than a DXE_DRIVER? It doesn't conform to the UEFI driver model. (I'm not saying it *must* not be a UEFI_DRIVER, but what reason does it have for being one?) It also calls no runtime services, and only the InstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces() boot service; so I don't think it relies on all of the architectural protocols either. Thanks Laszlo