public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rebecca@bsdio.com
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, ray.ni@intel.com,
	"lersek@redhat.com" <lersek@redhat.com>,
	"rfc@edk2.groups.io" <rfc@edk2.groups.io>,
	"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:56:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e85b03d6-03a6-d14f-9318-18da0a0523cb@bsdio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C2BE925@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On 2019-09-03 10:41, Ni, Ray wrote:
> Can we change the process a bit?
> 1. maintainers created pull requests on behave of the patch owners
> 2. patch owners can be notified automatically if pull requests fail
> 3. patch owners update the pull requests
>     (I am not familiar to pull requests. I assume the rights of modifying pull requests and creating pull requests are separated. Are they?)
>
> So, maintainers only need to initiate the pull requests. It assumes when pull requests are initiated, everyone at least agrees the justifications of the changes are valid and the ways the changes are done.

In other projects I've worked on, patch owners initiate the pre-commit
build/test, and either comment on the review (ideally with link to the
results) about its status, or have the CI system comment automatically
on the review page/thread.

Once the maintainer has signed off on the patch, it can then be sent for
gatekeeping, which is either a manual process whereby the repo owner (or
subsystem maintainer) checks the review, runs any additional tests they
want etc. - or via a 'land' command (for example with Review Board it's
"rbt land") which automates the checks and pushes the changeset.


I understand that with Azure Pipelines and how it integrates with
Github, along with the fact that this project doesn't use pull requests
or any other review automation, means things are probably going to be
pretty different to most other projects for now.


-- 

Rebecca Cran


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-04 23:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-29 20:22 [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1 Michael D Kinney
2019-08-29 20:39 ` [edk2-devel] " Michael Zimmermann
2019-08-29 21:08   ` Michael D Kinney
2019-08-30  2:21 ` Sean
2019-08-30 13:11   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-13 21:00     ` Sean
2019-09-16 11:06       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-19 21:45   ` Michael D Kinney
2019-09-19 21:55   ` Michael D Kinney
2019-09-20 21:29     ` Sean
2019-09-23 17:44       ` Michael D Kinney
2019-09-24 14:05         ` Liming Gao
2019-08-30  8:43 ` Liming Gao
2019-08-30 12:58   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-03  3:39     ` [edk2-rfc] " Ni, Ray
2019-09-03 13:19       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-03 16:41         ` Ni, Ray
2019-09-03 16:55           ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-03 17:09             ` Sean
2019-09-03 17:45               ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-19 21:13                 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-09-04 23:56           ` rebecca [this message]
2019-09-19 17:53   ` Michael D Kinney
2019-08-31 20:31 ` [edk2-rfc] " rebecca
2019-09-17  3:46 ` [edk2-devel] " rebecca

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e85b03d6-03a6-d14f-9318-18da0a0523cb@bsdio.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox