From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=66.187.233.73; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C2D2207E36DF for ; Tue, 8 May 2018 03:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E807401DEBB; Tue, 8 May 2018 10:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-52.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.52]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7799C073; Tue, 8 May 2018 10:35:39 +0000 (UTC) To: =?UTF-8?B?0JTQvNC40YLRgNC40Lkg0KHRgtC10L/QsNC90L7Qsg==?= , edk2-devel@lists.01.org References: From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 12:35:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.6]); Tue, 08 May 2018 10:35:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.6]); Tue, 08 May 2018 10:35:41 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.5' DOMAIN:'int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'lersek@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Subject: Re: OVMF Logo X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 10:35:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Dmitry, On 05/05/18 12:36, <8B@89 !B5?0=>2 wrote: > Hello! > Is it possible to tune Logo's behavior in OVMF? Now it overlaps > Windows Logo during system boot Hmmm, generally that shouldn't happen; the logo's location is made available to windows via the BGRT (boot graphics resource table) ACPI table. When we added BGRT support to OVMF [*], the location / appearance of the Windows boot animation did change (because it started considering the TianoCore logo displayed by OVMF), but I don't recall any actual *conflict* between the logo & the boot animation. [*] 6e5e544f227f ("OvmfPkg: Install BGRT ACPI table", 2017-01-06): > Note from Laszlo Ersek : without the BGRT ACPI > table, Windows 8 and Windows 10 first clear the screen, then display a > blue, slanted Windows picture above the rotating white boot animation. > With the BGRT ACPI table, Windows 8 and Windows 10 don't clear the > screen, the blue Windows image is not displayed, and the rotating > white boot animation is shown between the firmware's original > TianoCore boot splash and (optional) "Start boot option" progress bar. In brief, this shouldn't happen, and if it does, it's not specific to OVMF -- can you perhaps provide more information so that the MdeModulePkg maintainers might help with the investigation? What Windows release? What boot animation exactly? What screen resolution? Thanks! Laszlo