From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Nariman Poushin <nariman.poushin@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Boot failure for ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64, CpuArch protocol does not appear to be registered
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:25:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e88de491-163c-aadf-48c8-be3d83d0e2e0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_4r4+v3z6=MZhiERpSLMbg_Rcu-ZXh9irACJjKAbqU1Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/11/18 18:10, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 11 April 2018 at 17:34, Supreeth Venkatesh
> <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com> wrote:
>> Laszlo/Steve,
>>
>> I ran into the same problem on ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64 while running management mode.
>> I have fixed this problem in this patch by reordering driver load order here:
>> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2018-April/023550.html
>>
>> Not sure whether Leif/Ard/Laszlo agree with this.
>>
>
> Nope, sorry. PI has an elaborate scheme involving dependency
> expressions to manage load order of modules, and tweaking the order
> they appear in the flash volume to get things working again is not the
> way to address this.
>
> Ironically, though, it seems my patch
> 61a7b0ec634fa3288f47929ba3ced05ff48de739 (which introduces an AFTER
> xxx depex) is the culprit here, and so I should probably take some
> responsibility to get things working again.
>
> I will look into replacing the NorFlashDxe DEPEX with something more
> suitable to address this issue, but I am a bit swamped at the moment,
> so if anyone else beats me to it, I won't complain.
I'll try. :)
Thanks,
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-11 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-11 10:30 Boot failure for ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64, CpuArch protocol does not appear to be registered Steve Capper
2018-04-11 12:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-04-11 15:34 ` Supreeth Venkatesh
2018-04-11 16:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-04-11 16:25 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2018-04-11 16:20 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-04-11 16:41 ` Steve Capper
2018-04-12 15:02 ` Gao, Liming
2018-04-12 17:31 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e88de491-163c-aadf-48c8-be3d83d0e2e0@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox