From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B6F781CCB for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id t79so53715497wmt.0 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:34:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8BGj6CnuLMwTY3qaZcnc41Ny2ctExn/5iP3ydrwpV/Q=; b=fVFOQd2AGKJKfwpfp3WGZd53gpFXULsf6hNkGp4EJwrYJlpiN0EWRV9VqieVYH8z7K lpeBkZ86nll/l/z75xREh6RhebIH31vL8Vpf09x74mZO+8rebcJ9E9Hdh/zo8A6XzfR/ ScuRPxShalRVWdFBkyIeL1eiV7Y3WbbdQlZnVdImCulufXeQd7wrpRheIb0OP9Hlescy 3AcL/A6POtvLXNLpDb3yZfA4gJ9YcyruQVMzrcu69AmNrDQL2KVa2rzCyG3EoZ1VBFIR 5vTR+Ufi1Uvu1gpwcuBt2kemb/0J/d+v53/+Rru5GJuax7Bf9rSt9T5pmwbgNCl16Wp1 VRhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8BGj6CnuLMwTY3qaZcnc41Ny2ctExn/5iP3ydrwpV/Q=; b=CdDugzJmarvs01ZMlXOFOQ4OC/GrOt+UuTh830fV6uXKxEKjqA2lwW2/ET2jHyamxj XOGullbJc6Tb8gI5FtPFMmi8BO0JzYRBvNq0S798WnCNt68P+zaWJR0kG7OA3+MoF6B/ wp67c7KwXX+ZF+4SqjMRCYPYpIbArCnPBtIYB200+p8RF1jVTF/y3kq9CexwlIyaN8b7 ijtRBdVfPNyXW3SLpsA1L/GEK9sUkh477CjIa7O5TjrOQgXhuNtArdlr4yfTb+rJKGyO gPsqOV5Zeq5hDRO9dlPhtu2BOLleZkdawvx2q3mxAM/Cv4MwvuNtHlAQ0bz1ktHe8snA pD0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcq3Tifw4qsRlc8wQTgTRM9uuRhNa2co3ahF+AgAoKQoiHaxdIusJ1N9dH1Og3Tvw== X-Received: by 10.28.103.134 with SMTP id b128mr5104495wmc.54.1477924495829; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.165] (dynamic-adsl-78-12-246-178.clienti.tiscali.it. [78.12.246.178]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e2sm30274821wjw.14.2016.10.31.07.34.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:34:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini To: Michael Zimmermann , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" References: From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:34:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: using UEFI logo as part of another logo X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:34:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 31/10/2016 05:59, Michael Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > since the uefi logo guidlines are mainly targeted at "pure logo" usage I'm > not sure if the following would be legal: > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/efidroid/android_app_efidroidmanager/9d364dc4e8d59381d6c60404153c5dbf5aa4711a/app/src/main/res/mipmap-xxxhdpi/ic_launcher.png > > I'm not working for a company but I need a logo which I can use everywhere > and however I want so I really need to know if it's allowed to use the logo > like this. White on red falls outside the guidelines, I think. Paolo