From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>,
"jiewen.yao@intel.com" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] Adding Bhyve support into upstream EDK2
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:56:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9a2f37e-8f15-9515-1c02-7994263fb99b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR21MB0743CEA9D2C1A0E770DC2E01EFCE0@CY4PR21MB0743.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
On 03/25/20 19:18, Bret Barkelew wrote:
> Should it though? It seems like it should go the opposite way.
> ArmVirt->Ovmf and ArmVirt->Bhyve. Which one is the more core package?
> By naming it would *seem* that ArmVirt is more core, but maybe I’m
> wrong.
OvmfPkg is the more core package.
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-27 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-06 16:09 Adding Bhyve support into upstream EDK2 Rebecca Cran
2020-03-06 19:54 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-06 20:04 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-07 1:29 ` Yao, Jiewen
2020-03-24 1:34 ` Rebecca Cran
2020-03-25 0:04 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-25 18:18 ` [EXTERNAL] " Bret Barkelew
2020-03-27 12:56 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-03-25 18:50 ` Rebecca Cran
[not found] ` <15F9E16A0219E7B7.19404@groups.io>
2020-03-07 1:43 ` Yao, Jiewen
2020-03-07 7:39 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-07 7:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-08 2:40 ` Rebecca Cran
2020-03-09 6:08 ` Sean
2020-03-09 22:54 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-09 23:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-10 1:50 ` Sean
2020-03-10 9:05 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-10 17:25 ` Sean
2020-03-10 17:54 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-10 19:10 ` Sean
2020-03-10 19:23 ` Michael D Kinney
2020-03-10 19:44 ` Sean
2020-03-10 20:04 ` Rebecca Cran
2020-03-11 0:05 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-11 0:30 ` Sean
2020-03-11 3:21 ` Liming Gao
2020-03-10 23:34 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-11 0:43 ` Leif Lindholm
2020-03-07 7:53 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9a2f37e-8f15-9515-1c02-7994263fb99b@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox