From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com [63.128.21.74])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.10696.1585313779015684466
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Fri, 27 Mar 2020 05:56:19 -0700
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=gZoeWbaX;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 63.128.21.74, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1585313778;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=S9rmVrxzrMbsFfx/EqakWpFLQCCOqPv9GMyXuISzGoQ=;
	b=gZoeWbaXoP6AIKN5Ey+ih5MHIglj+LcAy9zwjXSUnBJt1+LL8BxJoVb9OPf/f5GUtzIR89
	R+dI2zLgg9Ifk+M+S9PPTTDeSmyu09y4vyVVdShubcGsb5zGuK8f9iGzfnTxQzYoDQdTI8
	85O/+9BEuTWVphWWj3bg7Pklyl8ZHuM=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-24-jwslYkZ0PPGD4KRsNr3BcA-1; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:56:14 -0400
X-MC-Unique: jwslYkZ0PPGD4KRsNr3BcA-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF44A149C0;
	Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:56:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-114-36.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.36])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8195B1001925;
	Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:56:11 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] Adding Bhyve support into upstream EDK2
To: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>,
 "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
 Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>, "jiewen.yao@intel.com"
 <jiewen.yao@intel.com>, "Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
References: <fefaf362-78d2-8914-26a6-ce1a72c02812@bsdio.com>
 <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F972D18@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <e12909db-307d-f411-f4c3-edfa3f9b73e3@bsdio.com>
 <e62078c1-f3ea-b216-385f-2030f95632be@redhat.com>
 <CY4PR21MB0743CEA9D2C1A0E770DC2E01EFCE0@CY4PR21MB0743.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <e9a2f37e-8f15-9515-1c02-7994263fb99b@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:56:10 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR21MB0743CEA9D2C1A0E770DC2E01EFCE0@CY4PR21MB0743.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 03/25/20 19:18, Bret Barkelew wrote:
> Should it though? It seems like it should go the opposite way.
> ArmVirt->Ovmf and ArmVirt->Bhyve. Which one is the more core package?
> By naming it would *seem* that ArmVirt is more core, but maybe I=92m
> wrong.

OvmfPkg is the more core package.

Thanks
Laszlo