From: "David A. Van Arnem" <dvanarnem@cmlab.biz>
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: brian.richardson@intel.com
Subject: Re: Is the UDK2017 branch stable?
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:22:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eaca0bfa-a604-3af3-ed4c-71b7c60acbf8@cmlab.biz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80AC2BAA3152784F98F581129E5CF5AF6654A6A0@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Great thank you. It sounds like the UDK2017 branch should be stable
enough for my purposes, I will just need to remember to pull updates
periodically.
Thanks,
David
On 01/30/2017 03:00 PM, Richardson, Brian wrote:
> UDK2017 is the current development branch. There is a stable release of UDK2017 planned for Q2'17 based on items scheduled for the next UEFI specification update and other improvements (HTTP/HTTPS Boot, SignedCapsulePkg, bug fixes, ...).
>
> We're working on getting a feature list to publish on the wiki. Unfortunately, some of this depends on UEFI spec info that we can't publish until the spec is finalized. I'll keep you posted.
>
> Thanks ... br
> ---
> Brian Richardson, Senior Technical Marketing Engineer, Intel Software
> brian.richardson@intel.com -- @intel_Brian (Twitter & WeChat)
> https://software.intel.com/en-us/meet-the-developers/evangelists/team/brian-richardson
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of David A. Van Arnem
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 4:29 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
> Subject: [edk2] Is the UDK2017 branch stable?
>
> Hi all,
>
> On a fresh clone of the EDK2 repo, I noticed there is a "UDK2017"
> branch. Is this currently a stable branch, like UDK2015 before it? I did not find any notes about a UDK2017 release on the tianocore website, only UDK2015 (probably too new), so I wanted to check here before I use it as a starting point.
> --
> Regards,
> David Van Arnem
> Development Engineer IV
> Computer Measurement Laboratory, LLC
>
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
--
Regards,
David Van Arnem
Development Engineer IV
Computer Measurement Laboratory, LLC
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-30 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-30 21:29 Is the UDK2017 branch stable? David A. Van Arnem
2017-01-30 22:00 ` Richardson, Brian
2017-01-30 22:22 ` David A. Van Arnem [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eaca0bfa-a604-3af3-ed4c-71b7c60acbf8@cmlab.biz \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox