From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=66.187.233.73; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28B182094606E for ; Fri, 4 May 2018 08:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 897EFA1BCD; Fri, 4 May 2018 15:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-129.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.129]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2B6111AF05; Fri, 4 May 2018 15:03:13 +0000 (UTC) To: "Carsey, Jaben" Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , "Gao, Liming" References: <814bebab-3b06-ce21-4fbb-326cc0a49121@redhat.com> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 17:03:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.2]); Fri, 04 May 2018 15:03:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.2]); Fri, 04 May 2018 15:03:14 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.3' DOMAIN:'int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'lersek@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 17/27] BaseTools: DataType - cleanup list constants X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 15:03:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 05/04/18 16:18, Carsey, Jaben wrote: > Laszlo, > > Wow. I thought I had tested, but clearly I missed that. > > Do you think we just revert back the name change short term? I agree > that mixing internal data structure names and names in the config > file seems wrong, I don’t know the ROI for separation. Maybe use a > dict to translate? Using a dictionary to translate seems OK to me -- it doesn't look large or complex, and it should be extensible in the future. Thanks, Laszlo