From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.51318.1681729427680226421
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Mon, 17 Apr 2023 04:03:48 -0700
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FMwf7nI+;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 170.10.133.124, mailfrom: kraxel@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1681729426;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=oNIm6vt/6SyonmT9nO2nVgIaoLZBLGI0TzzS6Arqsus=;
	b=FMwf7nI+DyIhu7Ku4oyWE7eHZnMpuVg3e0A6srVODY65HeO49MvYyEdWfYA6eN4JbDchF0
	3tK1cQt1Y0h6pwkeUs4I3ZFzeFrpEnCwyw9ybc1jpbMLeDvdqg22fNi8hHS5kurDfxGG+m
	8vuq50QMVISdA1LUH9qNivCQ/+sCvW4=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com
 [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-240-pjG2O0ZANt-znBl-MQzJ0w-1; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 07:03:41 -0400
X-MC-Unique: pjG2O0ZANt-znBl-MQzJ0w-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6587855312;
	Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:03:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (unknown [10.39.193.149])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6161240C20FA;
	Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:03:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8726E18000B3; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:03:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:03:37 +0200
From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>, 
	Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>, Yuwei Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com>, 
	Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>, Michael Kubacki <mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>, 
	Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>, Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>, 
	Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>, Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>, Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>, 
	Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>, Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>, 
	Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>, Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>, 
	Xiaoyu Lu <xiaoyu1.lu@intel.com>, Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>, 
	Gua Guo <gua.guo@intel.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, 
	Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>, Marvin =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=A4user?= <mhaeuser@posteo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template: Add GCC and GCCNOLTO toolchains
Message-ID: <ealsvunr6wzdrkgfoubbjfwzkzetv3y4eii3fwh6oh553cxdnc@6bswwtb5rmb7>
References: <20230416170532.278338-1-rebecca@bsdio.com>
 <20230416170532.278338-10-rebecca@bsdio.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20230416170532.278338-10-rebecca@bsdio.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.1
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

> +DEFINE GCCNOLTO_IA32_PREFIX    = ENV(GCCNOLTO_BIN)
> +DEFINE GCCNOLTO_X64_PREFIX     = ENV(GCCNOLTO_BIN)
> +
>  DEFINE GCC5_IA32_PREFIX        = ENV(GCC5_BIN)
>  DEFINE GCC5_X64_PREFIX         = ENV(GCC5_BIN)
> +DEFINE GCC_IA32_PREFIX         = ENV(GCC_BIN)
> +DEFINE GCC_X64_PREFIX          = ENV(GCC_BIN)

Does it make sense to have a separate prefix for each gcc variant?

I guess it makes sense for the existing GCC5 and GCC4x configs for
backward compatibility reasons, but for the new GCC / GCCNOLTO variants
not so much.

Trying to build ia32 ovmf with clang (15) and openssl fails btw:

ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __lshrdi3

But I guess that isn't something new introduced by this series.

take care,
  Gerd