From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@Intel.com>,
"Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/S3Resume2Pei: disable paging before creating new page table.
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:54:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec4d4c37-a002-d516-58ad-287f1838e48c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <062a4679-e3bf-28f1-31ba-83a124abb655@Intel.com>
On 10/09/18 10:26, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> On 10/9/2018 4:09 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>>
>>> Two comments:
>>> 1. We'd better not map the PcdCpuStackGuard to paging-enable. Maybe some
>>> other feature also enables the paging in PEI phase but the
>>> PcdCpuStackGuard is FALSE.
>>
>> I think I agree.
>>
>>> 2. When PEI is in 64bit mode, disabling paging may not work because
>>> paging-enable is a must in 64bit mode.
>>
>> I think this case is academic. S3Resume2Pei does not support 64-bit PEI
>> with SMM enabled. This is why we have commit 5133d1f1d297 ("OvmfPkg:
>> replace README fine print about X64 SMM S3 with PlatformPei check",
>> 2015-11-30) in OVMF.
>
> I found that commit. I just checked S3Resume2Pei module. It does assumes
> it's running in 32bit mode. And CpuS3.c also assumes S3Resume2Pei is
> running in 32bit mode.
>
>>
>> Anyway, I'm making this comment in the general sense only. I'm not
>> suggesting that we disable paging unconditionally. Actually, I believe,
>> I will suggest (under the v3 posting) restricting the write to CR0 even
>> more.
> Why?
I explained under v3.
Thanks,
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-09 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-09 1:51 [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/S3Resume2Pei: disable paging before creating new page table Eric Dong
2018-10-09 1:59 ` Wang, Jian J
2018-10-09 2:03 ` Wang, Jian J
2018-10-09 2:27 ` Dong, Eric
2018-10-09 2:05 ` Dong, Eric
2018-10-09 2:15 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-09 8:09 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-10-09 8:26 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-10-09 8:54 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-10 7:43 Eric Dong
2018-10-10 7:58 ` Yao, Jiewen
2018-10-10 13:03 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-10-10 13:14 ` Yao, Jiewen
2018-10-10 13:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-10-10 13:30 ` Yao, Jiewen
2018-10-10 14:00 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec4d4c37-a002-d516-58ad-287f1838e48c@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox