public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rebecca Cran" <rebecca@bsdio.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com, "Gao,
	Liming" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	"Liu, Zhiguang" <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MdePkg: Update code to be more C11 compliant by using __func__
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 18:21:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef4a1a9c-a7f9-8747-3bbd-05ee7b73546c@bsdio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB4929003630EB8A11ECD84469D2DE9@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Mike,

Yes, it passed CI - see https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/4022 .

I wasn't sure if we cared about EBC builds these days. Given the link on 
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/unified-extensible-firmware-interface/efi-homepage-general-technology.html 
to the compiler goes to a generic page that doesn't mention it, is it 
possible to get a copy if I want to verify if changes I'm making are 
compatible?

I know there was a project to add support for building EBC using LLVM, 
but I'm not sure if anything came of it.


The cover letter didn't come through, since my email from 
rebecca@quicinc.com is increasingly unreliable as some outgoing mail is 
blocked (see my message "Changes to my email").



The cover letter that didn't come through with the patch series is:

Update MdePkg to be more C11 compliant.

We require C11 following the addition of the _Static_assert macro in
Base.h.

Fix the 32-bit enum size check to use a signed int (which is the maximum
size allowed by C11), and change the use of the pre-standard __FUNCTION__
to the C11 __func__.

Personal PR: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/4022

On 2/9/23 18:01, Michael D Kinney wrote:
> Hi Rebecca,
> 
> Did this pass EDK II CI?
> 
> This change does break EBC compiler builds.  The following has to be added to
> MdePkg/Include/Ebc/ProcessorBind.h in order to use __func__ everywhere.
> 
>      #define __func__ __FUNCTION__
> 
> I also see __FUNCTION__ used in many packages.  I am wondering if we want
> to do this clean up if it should be its own patch series and update all
> packages in once series.
> 
> Mike
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Rebecca Cran
>> Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2023 7:45 AM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Liu, Zhiguang
>> <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
>> Cc: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@quicinc.com>
>> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MdePkg: Update code to be more C11 compliant by using __func__
>>
>> __FUNCTION__ is a pre-standard extension that gcc and Visual C++ among
>> others support, while __func__ was standardized in C99.
>>
>> Since it's more standard, replace __FUNCTION__ with __func__ throughout
>> MdePkg.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   MdePkg/Include/Library/PerformanceLib.h                                                    | 12 ++++++------
>>   MdePkg/Include/Library/UnitTestLib.h                                                       | 18 +++++++++---------
>>   MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/LoongArchCache.c                                    |  6 +++---
>>   MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c                                        | 12 ++++++------
>>   MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/SafeString.c                                                        |  2 +-
>>   MdePkg/Library/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib.c |  4 ++--
>>   MdePkg/Library/DxeRngLib/DxeRngLib.c                                                       | 14 +++++++-------
>>   7 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Library/PerformanceLib.h b/MdePkg/Include/Library/PerformanceLib.h
>> index 34ec956b9c0e..d0f2dfb070d5 100644
>> --- a/MdePkg/Include/Library/PerformanceLib.h
>> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Library/PerformanceLib.h
>> @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ LogPerformanceMeasurement (
>>   #define PERF_EVENT_SIGNAL_BEGIN(EventGuid) \
>>     do { \
>>       if (LogPerformanceMeasurementEnabled (PERF_GENERAL_TYPE)) { \
>> -      LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, EventGuid, __FUNCTION__ , 0, PERF_EVENTSIGNAL_START_ID); \
>> +      LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, EventGuid, __func__ , 0, PERF_EVENTSIGNAL_START_ID); \
>>       } \
>>     } while (FALSE)
>>
>> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ LogPerformanceMeasurement (
>>   #define PERF_EVENT_SIGNAL_END(EventGuid) \
>>     do { \
>>       if (LogPerformanceMeasurementEnabled (PERF_GENERAL_TYPE)) { \
>> -      LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, EventGuid, __FUNCTION__ , 0, PERF_EVENTSIGNAL_END_ID); \
>> +      LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, EventGuid, __func__ , 0, PERF_EVENTSIGNAL_END_ID); \
>>       } \
>>     } while (FALSE)
>>
>> @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ LogPerformanceMeasurement (
>>   #define PERF_CALLBACK_BEGIN(TriggerGuid) \
>>     do { \
>>       if (LogPerformanceMeasurementEnabled (PERF_GENERAL_TYPE)) { \
>> -      LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, TriggerGuid, __FUNCTION__ , 0, PERF_CALLBACK_START_ID); \
>> +      LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, TriggerGuid, __func__ , 0, PERF_CALLBACK_START_ID); \
>>       } \
>>     } while (FALSE)
>>
>> @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ LogPerformanceMeasurement (
>>   #define PERF_CALLBACK_END(TriggerGuid) \
>>     do { \
>>       if (LogPerformanceMeasurementEnabled (PERF_GENERAL_TYPE)) { \
>> -      LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, TriggerGuid, __FUNCTION__ , 0, PERF_CALLBACK_END_ID); \
>> +      LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, TriggerGuid, __func__ , 0, PERF_CALLBACK_END_ID); \
>>       } \
>>     } while (FALSE)
>>
>> @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ LogPerformanceMeasurement (
>>   #define PERF_FUNCTION_BEGIN() \
>>     do { \
>>       if (LogPerformanceMeasurementEnabled (PERF_GENERAL_TYPE)) { \
>> -      LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, NULL, __FUNCTION__ , 0, PERF_FUNCTION_START_ID); \
>> +      LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, NULL, __func__ , 0, PERF_FUNCTION_START_ID); \
>>       } \
>>     } while (FALSE)
>>
>> @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ LogPerformanceMeasurement (
>>   #define PERF_FUNCTION_END() \
>>     do { \
>>       if (LogPerformanceMeasurementEnabled (PERF_GENERAL_TYPE)) { \
>> -      LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, NULL, __FUNCTION__ , 0, PERF_FUNCTION_END_ID); \
>> +      LogPerformanceMeasurement (&gEfiCallerIdGuid, NULL, __func__ , 0, PERF_FUNCTION_END_ID); \
>>       } \
>>     } while (FALSE)
>>
>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Library/UnitTestLib.h b/MdePkg/Include/Library/UnitTestLib.h
>> index 71c205b1b143..321a310602d7 100644
>> --- a/MdePkg/Include/Library/UnitTestLib.h
>> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Library/UnitTestLib.h
>> @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
>>     @param[in]  Expression  Expression to be evaluated for TRUE.
>>   **/
>>   #define UT_ASSERT_TRUE(Expression)                                                                 \
>> -  if(!UnitTestAssertTrue ((Expression), __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Expression)) { \
>> +  if(!UnitTestAssertTrue ((Expression), __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Expression)) { \
>>       return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;                                                            \
>>     }
>>
>> @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
>>     @param[in]  Expression  Expression to be evaluated for FALSE.
>>   **/
>>   #define UT_ASSERT_FALSE(Expression)                                                                 \
>> -  if(!UnitTestAssertFalse ((Expression), __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Expression)) { \
>> +  if(!UnitTestAssertFalse ((Expression), __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Expression)) { \
>>       return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;                                                             \
>>     }
>>
>> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
>>     @param[in]  ValueB  Value to be compared for equality (64-bit comparison).
>>   **/
>>   #define UT_ASSERT_EQUAL(ValueA, ValueB)                                                                           \
>> -  if(!UnitTestAssertEqual ((UINT64)(ValueA), (UINT64)(ValueB), __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #ValueA, #ValueB)) { \
>> +  if(!UnitTestAssertEqual ((UINT64)(ValueA), (UINT64)(ValueB), __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #ValueA, #ValueB)) { \
>>       return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;                                                                           \
>>     }
>>
>> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
>>     @param[in]  Length   Number of bytes to compare in BufferA and BufferB.
>>   **/
>>   #define UT_ASSERT_MEM_EQUAL(BufferA, BufferB, Length)
>> \
>> -  if(!UnitTestAssertMemEqual ((VOID *)(UINTN)(BufferA), (VOID *)(UINTN)(BufferB), (UINTN)Length, __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER,
>> __FILE__, #BufferA, #BufferB)) { \
>> +  if(!UnitTestAssertMemEqual ((VOID *)(UINTN)(BufferA), (VOID *)(UINTN)(BufferB), (UINTN)Length, __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER,
>> __FILE__, #BufferA, #BufferB)) { \
>>       return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;
>> \
>>     }
>>
>> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
>>     @param[in]  ValueB  Value to be compared for inequality (64-bit comparison).
>>   **/
>>   #define UT_ASSERT_NOT_EQUAL(ValueA, ValueB)                                                                                       \
>> -  if(!UnitTestAssertNotEqual ((UINT64)(ValueA), (UINT64)(ValueB), __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #ValueA, #ValueB)) { \
>> +  if(!UnitTestAssertNotEqual ((UINT64)(ValueA), (UINT64)(ValueB), __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #ValueA, #ValueB)) { \
>>       return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;                                                                                           \
>>     }
>>
>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
>>     @param[in]  Status  EFI_STATUS value to check.
>>   **/
>>   #define UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR(Status)                                                           \
>> -  if(!UnitTestAssertNotEfiError ((Status), __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Status)) { \
>> +  if(!UnitTestAssertNotEfiError ((Status), __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Status)) { \
>>       return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;                                                           \
>>     }
>>
>> @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
>>     @param[in]  Expected  EFI_STATUS values to compare for equality.
>>   **/
>>   #define UT_ASSERT_STATUS_EQUAL(Status, Expected)                                                              \
>> -  if(!UnitTestAssertStatusEqual ((Status), (Expected), __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Status)) { \
>> +  if(!UnitTestAssertStatusEqual ((Status), (Expected), __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Status)) { \
>>       return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;                                                                       \
>>     }
>>
>> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ SaveFrameworkState (
>>     @param[in]  Pointer  Pointer to be checked against NULL.
>>   **/
>>   #define UT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(Pointer)                                                             \
>> -  if(!UnitTestAssertNotNull ((Pointer), __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Pointer)) { \
>> +  if(!UnitTestAssertNotNull ((Pointer), __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__, #Pointer)) { \
>>       return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;                                                         \
>>     }
>>
>> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ extern BASE_LIBRARY_JUMP_BUFFER  *gUnitTestExpectAssertFailureJumpBuffer;
>>         }                                                                \
>>         if (!UnitTestExpectAssertFailure (                               \
>>                UnitTestJumpStatus,                                       \
>> -             __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__,                \
>> +             __func__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FILE__,                \
>>                #FunctionCall, Status)) {                                 \
>>           return UNIT_TEST_ERROR_TEST_FAILED;                            \
>>         }                                                                \
>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/LoongArchCache.c b/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/LoongArchCache.c
>> index 4c8773278c3c..617b0f4218b8 100644
>> --- a/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/LoongArchCache.c
>> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/LoongArchCache.c
>> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ WriteBackInvalidateDataCache (
>>     VOID
>>     )
>>   {
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Not currently implemented on LoongArch.\n", __FUNCTION__));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Not currently implemented on LoongArch.\n", __func__));
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ WriteBackInvalidateDataCacheRange (
>>     IN      UINTN  Length
>>     )
>>   {
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Not currently implemented on LoongArch.\n", __FUNCTION__));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Not currently implemented on LoongArch.\n", __func__));
>>     return Address;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ WriteBackDataCacheRange (
>>     IN      UINTN  Length
>>     )
>>   {
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Not currently implemented on LoongArch.\n", __FUNCTION__));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Not currently implemented on LoongArch.\n", __func__));
>>     return Address;
>>   }
>>
>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c b/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c
>> index 67a3387ff3c6..bb26fe013d8b 100644
>> --- a/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c
>> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/BaseCacheMaintenanceLib/RiscVCache.c
>> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ InvalidateInstructionCacheRange (
>>     IN UINTN  Length
>>     )
>>   {
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n", __FUNCTION__));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n", __func__));
>>     return Address;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ WriteBackInvalidateDataCache (
>>     VOID
>>     )
>>   {
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n", __FUNCTION__));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n", __func__));
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ WriteBackInvalidateDataCacheRange (
>>     IN      UINTN  Length
>>     )
>>   {
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n", __FUNCTION__));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n", __func__));
>>     return Address;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ WriteBackDataCache (
>>     VOID
>>     )
>>   {
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n", __FUNCTION__));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n", __func__));
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ WriteBackDataCacheRange (
>>     IN      UINTN  Length
>>     )
>>   {
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n", __FUNCTION__));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n", __func__));
>>     return Address;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -245,6 +245,6 @@ InvalidateDataCacheRange (
>>     IN      UINTN  Length
>>     )
>>   {
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n", __FUNCTION__));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a:RISC-V unsupported function.\n", __func__));
>>     return Address;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/SafeString.c b/MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/SafeString.c
>> index b75b33381732..954d3f8c8988 100644
>> --- a/MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/SafeString.c
>> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/SafeString.c
>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>>       if (!(Expression)) { \
>>         DEBUG ((DEBUG_VERBOSE, \
>>           "%a(%d) %a: SAFE_STRING_CONSTRAINT_CHECK(%a) failed.  Return %r\n", \
>> -        __FILE__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __FUNCTION__, DEBUG_EXPRESSION_STRING (Expression), Status)); \
>> +        __FILE__, DEBUG_LINE_NUMBER, __func__, DEBUG_EXPRESSION_STRING (Expression), Status)); \
>>         return Status; \
>>       } \
>>     } while (FALSE)
>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib.c
>> b/MdePkg/Library/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib.c
>> index f47301de8982..a23113f9c91d 100644
>> --- a/MdePkg/Library/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib.c
>> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib/BaseOrderedCollectionRedBlackTreeLib.c
>> @@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ RedBlackTreeValidate (
>>     CONST RED_BLACK_TREE_NODE  *Last;
>>     CONST RED_BLACK_TREE_NODE  *Node;
>>
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_VERBOSE, "%a: Tree=%p\n", __FUNCTION__, Tree));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_VERBOSE, "%a: Tree=%p\n", __func__, Tree));
>>
>>     //
>>     // property #5
>> @@ -1459,7 +1459,7 @@ RedBlackTreeValidate (
>>     DEBUG ((
>>       DEBUG_VERBOSE,
>>       "%a: Tree=%p BlackHeight=%Ld Count=%Ld\n",
>> -    __FUNCTION__,
>> +    __func__,
>>       Tree,
>>       (INT64)BlackHeight,
>>       (INT64)ForwardCount
>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/DxeRngLib/DxeRngLib.c b/MdePkg/Library/DxeRngLib/DxeRngLib.c
>> index 82129aa44598..46aea515924f 100644
>> --- a/MdePkg/Library/DxeRngLib/DxeRngLib.c
>> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/DxeRngLib/DxeRngLib.c
>> @@ -37,43 +37,43 @@ GenerateRandomNumberViaNist800Algorithm (
>>     RngProtocol = NULL;
>>
>>     if (Buffer == NULL) {
>> -    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Buffer == NULL.\n", __FUNCTION__));
>> +    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Buffer == NULL.\n", __func__));
>>       return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>>     }
>>
>>     Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gEfiRngProtocolGuid, NULL, (VOID **)&RngProtocol);
>>     if (EFI_ERROR (Status) || (RngProtocol == NULL)) {
>> -    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Could not locate RNG prototocol, Status = %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
>> +    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: Could not locate RNG prototocol, Status = %r\n", __func__, Status));
>>       return Status;
>>     }
>>
>>     Status = RngProtocol->GetRNG (RngProtocol, &gEfiRngAlgorithmSp80090Ctr256Guid, BufferSize, Buffer);
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm CTR-256 - Status = %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm CTR-256 - Status = %r\n", __func__, Status));
>>     if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>       return Status;
>>     }
>>
>>     Status = RngProtocol->GetRNG (RngProtocol, &gEfiRngAlgorithmSp80090Hmac256Guid, BufferSize, Buffer);
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm HMAC-256 - Status = %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm HMAC-256 - Status = %r\n", __func__, Status));
>>     if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>       return Status;
>>     }
>>
>>     Status = RngProtocol->GetRNG (RngProtocol, &gEfiRngAlgorithmSp80090Hash256Guid, BufferSize, Buffer);
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm Hash-256 - Status = %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm Hash-256 - Status = %r\n", __func__, Status));
>>     if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>       return Status;
>>     }
>>
>>     // If all the other methods have failed, use the default method from the RngProtocol
>>     Status = RngProtocol->GetRNG (RngProtocol, NULL, BufferSize, Buffer);
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm Hash-256 - Status = %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: GetRNG algorithm Hash-256 - Status = %r\n", __func__, Status));
>>     if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>       return Status;
>>     }
>>
>>     // If we get to this point, we have failed
>> -  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: GetRNG() failed, staus = %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
>> +  DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: GetRNG() failed, staus = %r\n", __func__, Status));
>>
>>     return Status;
>>   }// GenerateRandomNumberViaNist800Algorithm()
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-10  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-09 15:45 [PATCH 1/2] MdePkg: Update Base.h to be compliant with C11 Rebecca Cran
2023-02-09 15:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] MdePkg: Update code to be more C11 compliant by using __func__ Rebecca Cran
2023-02-10  1:01   ` [edk2-devel] " Michael D Kinney
2023-02-10  1:21     ` Rebecca Cran [this message]
2023-02-10 11:45       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-02-10 15:19         ` Leif Lindholm
2023-02-10 18:16           ` Michael D Kinney
2023-02-12 19:59     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-14  2:19     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-14 20:40       ` Michael D Kinney
2023-03-17 13:31         ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-17 15:16           ` Michael D Kinney
2023-03-22 16:58             ` Michael D Kinney
2023-03-22 17:45               ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-23  0:58                 ` Michael D Kinney
2023-03-23  1:43                   ` Huang, Yanbo
2023-03-23  1:46                     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-17  4:23   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-10  1:03 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] MdePkg: Update Base.h to be compliant with C11 Michael D Kinney
2023-02-10  1:14   ` Rebecca Cran
2023-02-10  4:15     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-06 16:39 ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-10  2:45   ` 回复: " gaoliming
2023-03-10 17:58     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-13 17:54     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-13 20:46       ` Michael D Kinney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ef4a1a9c-a7f9-8747-3bbd-05ee7b73546c@bsdio.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox