From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
"Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"leif.lindholm@linaro.org" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: don't ASSERT on 'BootNext' varname
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 17:06:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0381728-e9ba-8623-9448-d225562585d0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0C09AFA07DD0434D9E2A0C6AEB0483103B97E486@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Star,
On 10/04/17 16:09, Zeng, Star wrote:
> Thanks for confirming the urgency.
>
> I have no strong motivation to keep/remove the ASSERT, I would like Ruiyu to argue and make the decision.
> I mainly want the issue (the code ends up calling this function(EfiBootManagerIsValidLoadOptionVariableName) on L"BootNext") could be root caused.
it might be interesting to find out about the exact call stack. However,
I'd like to point out that the exact purpose of the
EfiBootManagerIsValidLoadOptionVariableName() function is to check
*whether* the variable name is a valid boot option name or not. If not
-- for whatever reason -- then it shouldn't ASSERT(); it should just
return FALSE.
Perhaps it's relevant: the function was made public in commit 3dc5c1ae5c757.
Thanks
Laszlo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 9:54 PM
> To: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; leif.lindholm@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: don't ASSERT on 'BootNext' varname
>
> On 4 October 2017 at 14:49, Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com> wrote:
>> Creating Boot000@ with gEfiGlobalVariableGuid can not succeed as it
>> will be rejected by
>> MdeModulePkg/Library/VarCheckUefiLib/VarCheckUefiLib.inf that will check the VariableName against UEFI spec “Table 13. Global Variables”
>> if the VendorGuid is gEfiGlobalVariableGuid.
>>
>>
>>
>> I would suspect there is a bug at other place if the code ends up
>> calling this function(EfiBootManagerIsValidLoadOptionVariableName) on L"BootNext".
>>
>
> That still does not mean you should ASSERT() here. The state of the variable store != the internals of the code, and so it should be considered external input to some extent. ASSERTs are meant to catch programming errors, not errors in the varstore image.
>
>
>>
>> Ard,
>>
>> Is the fix urgent or not for you?
>>
>
> Not really. But fwupdate is shipping as part of many distros, so I guess others may run into it as well.
>
>> I may want to wait for Ruiyu’s back to take some look at the detail of it.
>>
>
> That is fine.
>
>> At the same time, you may help check the code flow in some detail if
>> you have free time, I think that will be helpful. J
>>
>
> OK.
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 17:17 [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: don't ASSERT on 'BootNext' varname Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-03 23:56 ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-03 23:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-04 0:18 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-04 13:49 ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-04 13:54 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-04 14:09 ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-04 15:06 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-10-05 7:31 ` Zeng, Star
2017-10-05 7:59 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-05 9:08 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-10-10 9:12 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-10-04 14:40 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-10-04 15:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0381728-e9ba-8623-9448-d225562585d0@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox