From: "Michael Kubacki" <mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>
To: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"rfc@edk2.groups.io" <rfc@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Andrew Fish (afish@apple.com)" <afish@apple.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Proposal to switch TianoCore Code Review from email to GitHub Pull Requests on 5-24-2024
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 09:58:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f07f62b2-8e7a-4bf1-8c39-c1e28a594461@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB49294071513FE1DD17DFEEB1D2182@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 5/2/2024 12:37 PM, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2024 3:57 AM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; mikuback@linux.microsoft.com; Kinney, Michael
>> D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; rfc@edk2.groups.io
>> Cc: Andrew Fish (afish@apple.com) <afish@apple.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Proposal to switch TianoCore Code Review from
>> email to GitHub Pull Requests on 5-24-2024
>>
>> On 2024-05-02 04:08, Michael Kubacki wrote:
>>> Thank you for this proposal. We've been anticipating this change for
>>> years and are excited to help support it.
>>>
>>> Here's some items we'd like to raise for feedback that we could help
>>> implement. Many could likely be done in time for the transition.
>>>
>>> 1. Automate reviewers - We've discussed CODEOWNERS in the past.
>> However,
>>> a simpler approach (in maintaining/syncing less files) would be to use
>>> Maintainers.txt directly with a GitHub workflow since the file already
>>> contains GitHub IDs.
>>
>> That would be ideal. I know Mike worked on autogenerating CODEOWNERS
>> from Maintainers.txt, but ultimately the latter supports more flexible
>> use of wildcards (things like */AArch64/ currently requires reconciling
>> against the repo contents).
>
> I have a python script that can verify if there are any differences
> Between CODEOWNERS and Maintainers.txt. I do not any tools that can
> convert Maintainers.txt to CODEOWNERS. That has been a manual process.
>
> I recommend we identify a plan to switch to CODEOWNERS and drop
> Maintainers.txt. May take a while for everyone to get used to the
> differences.
>
I agree it would be nice to switch to CODEOWNERS to reuse the native
functionality built into GitHub for it. We could build upon that if
necessary.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#118558): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/118558
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105847510/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-03 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-01 17:43 [edk2-devel] Proposal to switch TianoCore Code Review from email to GitHub Pull Requests on 5-24-2024 Michael D Kinney
2024-05-01 18:12 ` Leif Lindholm
2024-05-01 23:19 ` Dionna Glaze via groups.io
2024-05-02 15:59 ` Brian J. Johnson
2024-05-02 16:09 ` Dionna Glaze via groups.io
2024-05-02 16:30 ` [edk2-rfc] " Michael D Kinney
2024-05-06 16:41 ` Leara, William via groups.io
2024-05-02 1:28 ` Rebecca Cran
2024-05-02 10:21 ` Leif Lindholm
2024-05-02 3:08 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-02 10:57 ` Leif Lindholm
2024-05-02 16:37 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-03 16:58 ` Michael Kubacki [this message]
2024-05-03 16:54 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-02 6:33 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2024-05-02 10:34 ` Leif Lindholm
2024-05-02 15:21 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-02 16:24 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-03 17:21 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-03 19:16 ` [edk2-rfc] " Michael D Kinney
2024-05-02 9:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-05-02 15:14 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-03 0:35 ` [edk2-rfc] " Rebecca Cran
2024-05-02 17:50 ` Pedro Falcato
2024-05-02 18:17 ` [edk2-rfc] " Michael D Kinney
2024-05-03 17:38 ` Pedro Falcato
2024-05-03 20:12 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-03 20:38 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-04 0:57 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-05 18:10 ` Pedro Falcato
2024-05-06 10:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-05-06 15:11 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-06 15:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-05-06 15:56 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-06 16:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-05-10 20:57 ` Brian J. Johnson
2024-05-15 17:03 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-24 12:20 ` [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] " Rebecca Cran
2024-05-24 14:53 ` Michael Kubacki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f07f62b2-8e7a-4bf1-8c39-c1e28a594461@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox