Hi Edhaya,

Yes, we could get rid of the TPM 2.0 definitions and include the MdePkg 
definition, but it will require rework of TCG2.h to remove duplicate 
definitions.

But, what is the general of philosophy of what source code edk2-test 
should include from edk2?  Since the purpose of edk2-test is to test the 
firmware, for some things it seems better for edk2-test to have it's own 
private  definitions.  Otherwise, if there was an edk2 bug in something 
like a protocol definition, and if edk2-test included the same .h file, 
then the bug may never be discovered.  It's better if edk2-test defines 
it's own structs based on the specifications.  That way it is 
independent of the firmware and it's a better test.

In the case of Tpm20.h, that is probably not the case as those are TPM 
definitions, not protocol definitions.

Do you want me to try to get rid of the TPM definitions and use Tpm20.h 
for this patch series?  Or, as a separate patch?

Thanks,

Stuart

On 4/24/24 6:36 AM, G Edhaya Chandran via groups.io wrote:
> Update: We have the struct itself define here:
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Tpm20.h#L904 
>
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#118214): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/118214
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105558006/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-