From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56BD61A1E31 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 14:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9CA47DD39; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 21:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-116-104.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.104]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u95L6QEZ025982; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 17:06:26 -0400 To: Andrew Fish References: <93F01BC9-4B02-467E-B900-65C6775BB0F3@apple.com> <618fd786-24d4-653c-d6b8-cb774654c644@redhat.com> <7236196A5DF6C040855A6D96F556A53F3F3F6D@msmail.insydesw.com.tw> Cc: Tim Lewis , Leif Lindholm , "Carsey, Jaben" , edk2-devel-01 From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 23:06:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Wed, 05 Oct 2016 21:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Assert in ShellPkg with latest tianocore edk2 source on the Reference Platform X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 21:06:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/05/16 22:59, Andrew Fish wrote: > >> On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:58 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> >> On 10/05/16 22:44, Tim Lewis wrote: >>> Jaben -- >>> >>> In which cases would you have the Shell protocol present and not have the Unicode Collation protocol? >> >> That's exactly the question! >> >> According to the spec, at least if the system cannot boot from a disk >> device, then the collation protocol need not be present. >> >>> By my count, the Shell itself cannot function without it (see ProcessCommandLine()). >> >> In which case though I don't understand why Daniil experiences this >> change (= commit 583448b441650) as a regression on Juno. If the shell >> couldn't function without the collation protocol even before commit >> 583448b441650, then the shell must never have run on Juno -- because it >> appears to lack collation -- and then this change cannot be a regression. >> > > Looks like he has a DXE Driver that consume the ShellLib. That's it, thank you. Daniil named ArmJunoDxe.efi in his second (?) email. Laszlo