From: "Vladimir Olovyannikov" <vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Rabeda, Maciej" <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>,
devel@edk2.groups.io, Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>,
Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@arm.com>,
Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>, Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>,
Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>, Nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] ShellPkg/DynamicCommand: add HttpDynamicCommand
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:04:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9e78b422f6db992bf857d19cc64417a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8aa008fc-ed91-5118-df37-b24f2eb86c2f@redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 7, 2020 2:37 AM
> To: Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com>;
> Rabeda, Maciej <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io;
> Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>; Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@arm.com>; Jiaxin Wu
> <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>; Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>; Liming Gao
> <liming.gao@intel.com>; Nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] ShellPkg/DynamicCommand: add
> HttpDynamicCommand
>
> On 09/04/20 19:55, Vladimir Olovyannikov wrote:
>
> > There is also another issue with the TimebaseLib: inconsistency in
> > return values of the EfiTimeToEpoch (returns UINT32, should return
> > UINTN, as Zhichao pointed out earlier in the previous
> > HttpDynamicCommand patchset).
> > If this one is fixed, I can just use the TimeBaseLib.h header for
> > constants.
>
> Consuming TimeBaseLib.h in this patch would be really nice.
OK, if this can be fixed, I will definitely use TimeBaseLib.h header for
constants, and will drop
duplicate definitions in Http.c/Http.h
>
> There are two EfiTimeToEpoch() call sites in edk2:
>
> ArmPlatformPkg/Library/PL031RealTimeClockLib/PL031RealTimeClockLib.c
> EmbeddedPkg/Library/VirtualRealTimeClockLib/VirtualRealTimeClockLib.c
>
> The latter stores the return value in a UINTN variable, so that seems OK.
> The
> former is a bit messier, but it seems to ensure that the result fits in 32
> bits for
> HW reasons anyway:
>
> // Because the PL031 is a 32-bit counter counting seconds,
> // the maximum time span is just over 136 years.
> // Time is stored in Unix Epoch format, so it starts in 1970,
> // Therefore it can not exceed the year 2106.
> if ((Time->Year < 1970) || (Time->Year >= 2106)) {
> return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
> }
> ...
> EpochSeconds = EfiTimeToEpoch (Time);
> ...
> MmioWrite32 (mPL031RtcBase + PL031_RTC_LR_LOAD_REGISTER,
> EpochSeconds);
>
> So I think we'd need two patches:
>
> (1) add an explicit (UINT32) cast to the EfiTimeToEpoch() call in
> "ArmPlatformPkg/Library/PL031RealTimeClockLib/PL031RealTimeClockLib.c",
>
> (2) change the return value to UINTN in
> "EmbeddedPkg/Include/Library/TimeBaseLib.h" and
> "EmbeddedPkg/Library/TimeBaseLib/TimeBaseLib.c".
>
> Hmm wait... There are five more call sites in edk2-platforms. :( OK, I
> give up
> here. Sorry.
OK, so what are the next steps, what do you suggest?
I saw today that unused macros like SEC_PER_MONTH, etc. were removed from
TimeBaseLib.h.
Thank you,
Vladimir
>
> Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-08 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-02 4:08 [PATCH v10 0/1] ShellPkg/DynamicCommand: add HttpDynamicCommand Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-02 4:08 ` [PATCH v10 1/1] " Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-04 13:10 ` Maciej Rabeda
2020-09-04 15:20 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-09-04 17:55 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-07 9:36 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-09-08 21:04 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov [this message]
2020-09-09 10:50 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-09-09 17:15 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-10 6:25 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9e78b422f6db992bf857d19cc64417a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox