From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lersek@redhat.com>
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom;
 client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com;
 receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org 
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8001208F79F2
 for <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.14])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F723C059B78;
 Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:51:11 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 1F723C059B78
Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com;
 spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lersek@redhat.com
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-150.rdu2.redhat.com
 [10.10.120.150])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120985D962;
 Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:51:09 +0000 (UTC)
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
 "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
 Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
References: <20171020112325.10814-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
 <20171020130024.l73uww7cxsjnwbsv@bivouac.eciton.net>
 <51d0ef33-022f-7153-9acd-9bc4a26cdd59@redhat.com>
 <CAKv+Gu9GCSDA-soj7A6oxgXR0Bdg+CLwh=33HoQPFEcmJzG0NQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E16EABD@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <CAKv+Gu9S-ypDNy6AHwdLUv=bo+AxCQkNfVU5PK1ER52_hhY5Fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <fa2fa397-4c43-66c8-8fdc-46f819edf367@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:51:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9S-ypDNy6AHwdLUv=bo+AxCQkNfVU5PK1ER52_hhY5Fw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:51:11 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ArmPlatformPkg/PrePeiCore: seed temporary stack before entering PEI core
X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: EDK II Development  <edk2-devel.lists.01.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/options/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:47:32 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10/20/17 18:39, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 20 October 2017 at 17:37, Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com> wrote:
>> Ard:
>>   This case is to share the same value between PeiCore and SecCore. I also think it will be better to define one fixed PCD in MdeModulePkg.dec for this value. Could you submit bugzillar to catch this issue first?
>>
> 
> Certainly!

Would it be possible to define the PCD as UINT32, and task 64-bit SEC
(and PEI_CORE) code to first construct the wider value manually (in a
register or otherwise)?

Just thinking out loud.

Thanks!
Laszlo