Re: PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>]

Hi Lars,

On 15/03/2019 17:04, Lars Kurth wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15/03/2019, 02:35, "Julien Grall" <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>      Hi Lars,
>      
>      On 14/03/2019 20:04, Lars Kurth wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > On 14/03/2019, 12:07, "Julien Grall" <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote:
>      >
>      >      (+ Lars)
>      >
>      >      On 3/14/19 10:55 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>      >      > On 03/13/19 18:54, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
>      >      > (2.2.2) Files that seem to be covered by the MIT license.
>      >      >
>      >      >            OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/arch-arm/xen.h
>      > ...
>      >      >            OvmfPkg/XenBusDxe/XenStore.h
>      >      >
>      >      >          It's OK to leave these untouched, for now. Later, we should
>      >      >          probably replace their license blocks with
>      >      >          "SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT" (as appropriate). It might make
>      >      >          sense to file a TianoCore BZ about them immediately, with a
>      >      >          BZ-dependency on BZ#1373.
>      >
>      >      I have added Lars Kurth to confirm the license.
>      >
>      > Can you give me some context? It's not clear to me what you expect me to do.
>      
>      EDK2 is converting the full copyright in each file to SDPX identifier. While the
>      copyright looks like an MIT license, it has never been confirmed. Andrew Cooper
>      suggested you might be able to confirm.
>      
> Is there a web-link to the files/repos such that I don’t have to clone the repo
> Lars

Here an example of files from Xen public headers:

https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=tree;f=xen/include/public;h=0618b0134d2b9babcba71a3f0f86be5a84468b50;hb=HEAD

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall