From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>, edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [Patch V3 0/3] StartAllAPs should not use disabled APs
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:18:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc507469-b8f6-ba45-3215-69b044e6aacc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c47f474d-8dda-fd06-b7f1-5891b35cf5a1@redhat.com>
On 07/25/18 14:12, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 07/25/18 09:50, Eric Dong wrote:
>> This patch series include changes:
>> 1. StartAllAPs should not use disabled APs, this is required by UEFI spec.
>> 2. Refine the code to remove the redundant definitions.
>>
>> V2 changes:
>> Use CpuStateReady to distinguish the AP state from CpuStateIdle.
>>
>> V3 Changes:
>> Only change 3/3 patch. Only not use disabled APs when WakeUpAP called
>> by StartAllAps function. In other cases, also include disabled APs.
>>
>> Eric Dong (3):
>> UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove redundant CpuStateFinished State.
>> UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove StartCount and volatile definition.
>> UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Not use disabled AP when call StartAllAPs.
>>
>> UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------
>> UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h | 4 +---
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>
> I requested commit message updates for all three patches. With those
> implemented, please add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>
> (No need to repost.)
>
> Please give me some more time to regression-test this series as well.
This series works nicely on my end. I performed my usual Linux guest
tests, in all my usual guest environments, plus 10 cold boots in each
environment. Everything worked fine.
For patches #1 and #2:
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
For patch #3:
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
(I'm giving R-t-b and not T-b for patch #3 because OVMF doesn't exercise
the MP PPI/Protocol member functions that disable APs.)
>From my side, please update the commit messages as agreed, and go ahead
with the pushing.
Thanks!
Laszlo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-25 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-25 7:50 [Patch V3 0/3] StartAllAPs should not use disabled APs Eric Dong
2018-07-25 7:50 ` [Patch v3 1/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove redundant CpuStateFinished State Eric Dong
2018-07-25 10:54 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-25 11:15 ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-26 5:18 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-07-25 7:50 ` [Patch v3 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove StartCount and volatile definition Eric Dong
2018-07-25 11:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-25 12:09 ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-25 15:18 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26 5:22 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-07-25 7:50 ` [Patch v3 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Not use disabled AP when call StartAllAPs Eric Dong
2018-07-25 12:11 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-25 12:44 ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-26 8:36 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-07-26 8:36 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-07-25 12:12 ` [Patch V3 0/3] StartAllAPs should not use disabled APs Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-25 15:18 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc507469-b8f6-ba45-3215-69b044e6aacc@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox