From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>, Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 09/28] OvmfPkg/VmgExitLib: Allow PMBASE register access in Dxe phase
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 17:10:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdfff02f-1f22-a99d-33d2-4d370e355cea@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cacffbb6-38ea-732d-9970-f3ff15af04f0@amd.com>
On 05/07/21 15:29, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>
> On 5/6/21 9:08 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 04/30/21 13:51, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>> BZ: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.tianocore.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D3275&data=04%7C01%7Cbrijesh.singh%40amd.com%7C01d3e5c5268043c18bdf08d910987251%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637559069206222390%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=CN2hZrjsKzfSqMAxcQLtoHTUqBOlZmdDEO9vY9XT%2FTQ%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>> Commit 85b8eac59b8c5bd9c7eb9afdb64357ce1aa2e803 added support to ensure
>>> that MMIO is only performed against the un-encrypted memory. If MMIO
>>> is performed against encrypted memory, a #GP is raised.
>>>
>>> The VmgExitLib library depends on ApicTimerLib to get the APIC base
>>> address so that it can exclude the APIC range from the un-encrypted
>>> check. The OvmfPkg provides ApicTimerLib for the DXE phase. The
>>> constructor AcpiTimerLibConstructor() used in the ApicTimerLib uses
>>> the PciRead to get the PMBASE register. The PciRead() will cause an
>>> MMIO access.
>>>
>>> The AmdSevDxe driver clears the memory encryption attribute from the
>>> MMIO ranges. However, if VmgExitLib is linked to AmdSevDxe driver then the
>>> AcpiTimerLibConstructor() will be called before AmdSevDxe driver can
>>> clear the encryption attributes for the MMIO regions.
>>>
>>> Exclude the PMBASE register from the encrypted check so that we
>>> can link VmgExitLib to the MemEncryptSevLib; which gets linked to
>>> AmdSevDxe driver.
>> The above explanation is inexact. There are several typos ("APIC" is
>> incorrect, "ACPI" would be correct, for the TimerLib instance in
>> question), but that's really just a side observation.
>>
>> The precise explanation is the following library instance dependency
>> chain:
>>
>> OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe/AmdSevDxe.inf
>> -----> MemEncryptSevLib class
>> -----> "OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/DxeMemEncryptSevLib.inf" instance
>> -[*]-> VmgExitLib class
>> -----> "OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitLib.inf" instance
>> -----> LocalApicLib class
>> -----> "UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseXApicX2ApicLib/BaseXApicX2ApicLib.inf" instance
>> -----> TimerLib class
>> -----> "OvmfPkg/Library/AcpiTimerLib/DxeAcpiTimerLib.inf" instance
>> -----> PciLib class
>> -----> "OvmfPkg/Library/DxePciLibI440FxQ35/DxePciLibI440FxQ35.inf" instance
>> -----> PciExpressLib class
>> -----> "MdePkg/Library/BasePciExpressLib/BasePciExpressLib.inf" instance
>>
>> The link (or dependency) marked with [*] is introduced in patch #26
>> ("OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: Change the page state in the RMP table").
>> That's the change that triggers the symptom. (In combination with you
>> testing on Q35, because on i440fx, the DxePciLibI440FxQ35 lib instance
>> accesses PCI config space via the 0xCF8, 0xCFC IO Ports, and those are
>> unaffected by SEV-ES.)
>>
>> The symptom is somewhat "unjustified", because at the end of the series,
>> the AmdSevDxe driver makes no calls to actual TimerLib APIs (I checked
>> -- I disassembled the "AmdSevDxe.debug" file with "objdump -S", and
>> there is no call to any API declared in the "TimerLib.h" class header).
>> However, the ECAM (MMCONFIG) access is still triggered, because the
>> AcpiTimerLibConstructor() function, in
>> "OvmfPkg/Library/AcpiTimerLib/DxeAcpiTimerLib.c", is the constructor for
>> the "OvmfPkg/Library/AcpiTimerLib/DxeAcpiTimerLib.inf" instance, and
>> AcpiTimerLibConstructor() calls PciRead32().
>>
>> If you check the "OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc" file, you'll find that the
>> PciLib class is resolved to
>> "MdePkg/Library/BasePciLibCf8/BasePciLibCf8.inf" by default, and to
>> "OvmfPkg/Library/DxePciLibI440FxQ35/DxePciLibI440FxQ35.inf" for the
>> following module types:
>>
>> - DXE_DRIVER,
>> - DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER,
>> - SMM_CORE,
>> - DXE_SMM_DRIVER,
>> - UEFI_DRIVER,
>> - UEFI_APPLICATION.
>>
>> The consequence is that modules strictly after the DXE_CORE get
>> dynamically enabled extended config space access (ECAM) on Q35 via the
>> PciLib class, whereas all modules strictly before the DXE_CORE, and the
>> DXE_CORE itself, are restricted to normal config space (IO Ports 0xCF8 /
>> 0xCFC) via the PciLib class.
>>
>> AmdSevDxe is a DXE_DRIVER, so it used to get DxePciLibI440FxQ35 as well.
>>
>> The solution should be simple. In the AmdSevDxe driver specifically, we
>> need no access to extended PCI config space. Accessing normal PCI config
>> space, via IO Ports 0xCF8 / 0xCFC, should suffice. That can be achieved
>> with the following module-scope override:
>
> Thanks Laszlo, I was not aware of the module-scope override. I will go
> with this approach and make sure it works after the inclusion of the
> VmgExitLib.
>
>
>>
>>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc b/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc
>>> index 8d9a0a077601..45a02b236633 100644
>>> --- a/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc
>>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc
>>> @@ -966,7 +966,10 @@ [Components]
>>> !endif
>>>
>>> OvmfPkg/PlatformDxe/Platform.inf
>>> - OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe/AmdSevDxe.inf
>>> + OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe/AmdSevDxe.inf {
>>> + <LibraryClasses>
>>> + PciLib|MdePkg/Library/BasePciLibCf8/BasePciLibCf8.inf
>>> + }
>>> OvmfPkg/IoMmuDxe/IoMmuDxe.inf
>>> OvmfPkg/AmdSev/SecretDxe/SecretDxe.inf
>>>
>> (
>>
>> For consistency, all DSC files that include
>> "OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe/AmdSevDxe.inf" should be modified similarly:
>>
>> - OvmfPkg/AmdSev/AmdSevX64.dsc
>> - OvmfPkg/Bhyve/BhyveX64.dsc
>> - OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc
>> - OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc
>> - OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc
>>
>> )
>>
>> Therefore, please try dropping this patch, and modifying patch#26
>> instead -- the above module-scope override (for 5 DSC files) should be
>> squashed into patch#26, *and* the explanation I provided above should be
>> included in the commit message of patch#26.
>>
>> ... Correction: you have an independent bug in the series that affects
>> my above analysis. Namely, you *seem* to add the VmgExitLib dependency
>> to the "OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/DxeMemEncryptSevLib.inf"
>> library instance, in patch#26. That's where you modify the INF file. But
>> that's wrong: in patch#21 ("OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: Add support to
>> validate system RAM"), you add a VmgInit() call to the same library
>> instance, via the new file
>> "OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/SnpPageStateChangeInternal.c".
>>
>> The bug in that patch is clear from the fact that you introduce an
>> #include <Library/VmgExitLib.h> directive, but that's not mirrored by an
>> appropriate [LibraryClasses] change in the "DxeMemEncryptSevLib.inf"
>> file. (The other two lib instance INF files, "SecMemEncryptSevLib.inf"
>> and "PeiMemEncryptSevLib.inf" *are* modified as needed.)
>>
>> So you even need to move some stuff from patch#26 to patch#21, and
>> *then* squash the above module-scope override (and explanation) into
>> patch#21.
>>
>> A significant amount of work is needed on this series. I'll stop
>> reviewing RFC v2 here, because I don't want to look at the remaining
>> patches deeply as long as code movements etc are going to affect them.
>> Please post the next version -- assuming no other reviewer would like to
>> finish reviewing this version first!
>
>
> Sounds good. What's your thought if I take out patch 1 - 9 from this RFC
> series and submit them as non-RFC for the further review and acceptance
> ? The patch# 1-9 are basically prepatch before we get into SNP specific
> bits.
More precisely, that means patches 1-8 (because patch#9 should be
replaced by the module-scope override, and also moved to just before
what is currently patch#21).
Other than that, I agree, this is a good idea. I've anyway thought that
the MdePkg stuff (5 patches) could be / should be merged up-front in
separation, and then the subsequent 3 patches for OvmfPkg are basically
refactoring. We can record the resultant commit range (8 commits) in
TianoCore#3275, and keep the BZ open for the rest of the work. So go
ahead please.
Thanks!
Laszlo
>
>
>> Thanks
>> Laszlo
>>
>>> Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>>> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/SecVmgExitLib.inf | 4 ++
>>> OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitLib.inf | 7 +++
>>> OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitVcHandler.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/SecVmgExitLib.inf b/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/SecVmgExitLib.inf
>>> index e6f6ea7972..22435a0590 100644
>>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/SecVmgExitLib.inf
>>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/SecVmgExitLib.inf
>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>> SecVmgExitVcHandler.c
>>>
>>> [Packages]
>>> + MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
>>> MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
>>> OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.dec
>>> UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dec
>>> @@ -42,4 +43,7 @@
>>> [FixedPcd]
>>> gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfSecGhcbBackupBase
>>> gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfSecGhcbBackupSize
>>> + gEfiMdePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciExpressBaseAddress
>>>
>>> +[Pcd]
>>> + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfHostBridgePciDevId
>>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitLib.inf b/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitLib.inf
>>> index c66c68726c..d3175c260e 100644
>>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitLib.inf
>>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitLib.inf
>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>> PeiDxeVmgExitVcHandler.c
>>>
>>> [Packages]
>>> + MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
>>> MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
>>> OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.dec
>>> UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dec
>>> @@ -37,4 +38,10 @@
>>> DebugLib
>>> LocalApicLib
>>> MemEncryptSevLib
>>> + PcdLib
>>>
>>> +[FixedPcd]
>>> + gEfiMdePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciExpressBaseAddress
>>> +
>>> +[Pcd]
>>> + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfHostBridgePciDevId
>>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitVcHandler.c b/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitVcHandler.c
>>> index 24259060fd..01ac5d8c19 100644
>>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitVcHandler.c
>>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitVcHandler.c
>>> @@ -14,7 +14,10 @@
>>> #include <Library/VmgExitLib.h>
>>> #include <Register/Amd/Msr.h>
>>> #include <Register/Intel/Cpuid.h>
>>> +#include <IndustryStandard/Q35MchIch9.h>
>>> +#include <IndustryStandard/I440FxPiix4.h>
>>> #include <IndustryStandard/InstructionParsing.h>
>>> +#include <Library/PcdLib.h>
>>>
>>> #include "VmgExitVcHandler.h"
>>>
>>> @@ -596,6 +599,40 @@ UnsupportedExit (
>>> return Status;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +STATIC
>>> +BOOLEAN
>>> +IsPmbaBaseAddress (
>>> + IN UINTN Address
>>> + )
>>> +{
>>> + UINT16 HostBridgeDevId;
>>> + UINTN Pmba;
>>> +
>>> + //
>>> + // Query Host Bridge DID to determine platform type
>>> + //
>>> + HostBridgeDevId = PcdGet16 (PcdOvmfHostBridgePciDevId);
>>> + switch (HostBridgeDevId) {
>>> + case INTEL_82441_DEVICE_ID:
>>> + Pmba = POWER_MGMT_REGISTER_PIIX4 (PIIX4_PMBA);
>>> + break;
>>> + case INTEL_Q35_MCH_DEVICE_ID:
>>> + Pmba = POWER_MGMT_REGISTER_Q35 (ICH9_PMBASE);
>>> + //
>>> + // Add the MMCONFIG base address to get the Pmba base access address
>>> + //
>>> + Pmba += FixedPcdGet64 (PcdPciExpressBaseAddress);
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + return FALSE;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + // Round up the offset to page size
>>> + Pmba = Pmba & ~(SIZE_4KB - 1);
>>> +
>>> + return (Address == Pmba);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> Validate that the MMIO memory access is not to encrypted memory.
>>>
>>> @@ -640,6 +677,14 @@ ValidateMmioMemory (
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + //
>>> + // Allow PMBASE accesses (which will have the encryption bit set before
>>> + // AmdSevDxe runs in the DXE phase)
>>> + //
>>> + if (IsPmbaBaseAddress (Address)) {
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> //
>>> // Any state other than unencrypted is an error, issue a #GP.
>>> //
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-07 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-30 11:51 [PATCH RFC v2 00/28] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/28] MdePkg: Expand the SEV MSR to include the SNP definition Brijesh Singh
2021-05-03 8:39 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-03 11:42 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/28] MdePkg: Define the GHCB Hypervisor features Brijesh Singh
2021-05-03 10:10 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-03 12:20 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-05-03 13:40 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/28] MdePkg: Define the GHCB GPA structure Brijesh Singh
2021-05-03 10:24 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-03 12:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-03 12:55 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-05-03 13:50 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-03 13:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/28] MdePkg: Define the Page State Change VMGEXIT structures Brijesh Singh
2021-05-04 12:33 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-04 13:59 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-04 14:48 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2021-05-04 18:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-04 18:53 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-05-05 18:24 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-05 19:27 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/28] MdePkg: Add AsmPvalidate() support Brijesh Singh
2021-05-04 13:58 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-04 14:09 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-04 19:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-05-05 18:56 ` Laszlo Ersek
[not found] ` <167BF2A01FA60569.6407@groups.io>
2021-05-04 19:55 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-05-05 19:10 ` Laszlo Ersek
[not found] ` <167BF53DA09B327E.22277@groups.io>
2021-05-04 20:28 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-05-04 23:03 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-05-05 19:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-05 19:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/28] OvmfPkg/BaseMemEncryptSevLib: Introduce MemEncryptSevClearMmioPageEncMask() Brijesh Singh
2021-05-06 10:39 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-06 19:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/28] OvmfPkg: Use MemEncryptSevClearMmioPageEncMask() to clear EncMask from Mmio Brijesh Singh
2021-05-06 10:50 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-06 19:20 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/28] OvmfPkg/BaseMemEncryptSevLib: Remove CacheFlush parameter Brijesh Singh
2021-05-06 11:08 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/28] OvmfPkg/VmgExitLib: Allow PMBASE register access in Dxe phase Brijesh Singh
2021-05-06 14:08 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-06 14:12 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-07 13:29 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-05-07 15:10 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2021-05-07 15:19 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-05-07 15:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/28] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: add MemEncryptSevSnpEnabled() Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/28] OvmfPkg: Reserve Secrets page in MEMFD Brijesh Singh
2021-05-05 6:42 ` [edk2-devel] " Dov Murik
2021-05-05 13:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-05-05 19:33 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-06 10:57 ` Dov Murik
2021-05-06 15:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-05-06 16:12 ` James Bottomley
2021-05-06 16:02 ` James Bottomley
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/28] OvmfPkg: Reserve CPUID page for the SEV-SNP guest Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 13/28] OvmfPkg: Validate the data pages used in the Reset vector and SEC phase Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 14/28] UefiCpuPkg: Define the SEV-SNP specific dynamic PCDs Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 15/28] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: extend the workarea to include SNP enabled field Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 16/28] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: Extend Es Workarea to include hv features Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 17/28] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: Invalidate the GHCB page Brijesh Singh
2021-05-03 13:05 ` Erdem Aktas
2021-05-03 14:28 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 18/28] OvmfPkg: Add a library to support registering GHCB GPA Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 19/28] OvmfPkg: register GHCB gpa for the SEV-SNP guest Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 20/28] UefiCpuPkg/MpLib: add support to register GHCB GPA when SEV-SNP is enabled Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 21/28] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: Add support to validate system RAM Brijesh Singh
2021-05-03 14:04 ` Erdem Aktas
2021-05-03 18:56 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 22/28] OvmfPkg/BaseMemEncryptSevLib: Skip the pre-validated " Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 23/28] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: Add support to validate > 4GB memory in PEI phase Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 24/28] OvmfPkg/SecMain: Pre-validate the memory used for decompressing Fv Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 25/28] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: Validate the system RAM when SNP is active Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 26/28] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: Change the page state in the RMP table Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 27/28] OvmfPkg/AmdSev: Expose the SNP reserved pages through configuration table Brijesh Singh
2021-05-05 7:10 ` [edk2-devel] " Dov Murik
2021-05-05 19:37 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-04-30 11:51 ` [PATCH RFC v2 28/28] MdePkg/GHCB: Increase the GHCB protocol max version Brijesh Singh
2021-04-30 16:49 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 00/28] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdfff02f-1f22-a99d-33d2-4d370e355cea@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox