From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lersek@redhat.com>
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom;
 client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com;
 receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org 
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 966BA21B02822
 for <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.13])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0261B81102;
 Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:26:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-71.rdu2.redhat.com
 [10.10.120.71])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E57608E6;
 Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:26:00 +0000 (UTC)
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>, edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
 Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>, Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
References: <20180913095046.9480-1-ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
 <f4217b25-a4f9-48ff-0a70-1e233016972d@redhat.com>
 <f45090cf-91f7-e2a9-9139-cf22df6b6c7c@redhat.com>
 <9a0e968d-f6e4-18ad-f869-60fc88806735@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <ff709a5a-3add-5602-ab17-d065d399f9d1@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:25:59 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9a0e968d-f6e4-18ad-f869-60fc88806735@redhat.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:26:02 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] MdePkg/SynchronizationLib: fix Interlocked[De|In]crement return value
X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EDK II Development  <edk2-devel.lists.01.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/options/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:26:02 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 09/25/18 20:29, Laszlo Ersek wrote:

> So here's what I'm going to do. I will submit a standalone, "surgical"
> patch, for fixing the regression introduced in 17634d026f96.

Filed <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1207> about that.

> Additionally, I will file a TianoCore BZ about the *other* bugs in
> GccInline.c, and suggest that we fix those issues by eliminating the
> GCC-specific variant altogether.

That one is <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208>.

Thanks
Laszlo