public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leif Lindholm" <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
To: <devel@edk2.groups.io>, <jlee@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] How do debug tianocore.PatchCheck failed?
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:32:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff9c0d85-540f-4cae-807e-57d01426e0fa@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240702064243.GU7611@linux-l9pv.suse>

Hi Joey,

On 2024-07-02 07:42, joeyli via groups.io wrote:
> Hi EDK2 experts,
> 
> I was filed a submit request on github for
> "[PATCH] EmbeddedPkg/VirtualRealTimeClockLib: Support SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH". But
> I got a Azure Pipelines/tianocore.PatchCheck failed:
> 
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/5550/checks?check_run_id=24185647984
> 
> 	Check failure on line 26 in Build log
> 	@azure-pipelines azure-pipelines / tianocore.PatchCheck
> 	Build log #L26
> 	Bash exited with code '255'.

The CI system is a bit "beware of the leopard" with regards to finding 
the failures.

If I go to the link above, I see the message you're copying, but below 
that there is a link "View more details on Azure Pipelines". Clicking 
that takes me to a page that says "build not found" - since the logs 
have been purged since the test was run 2 months ago. Otherwise you'd be 
able to find logs there explaining the failure.

> The patch only change one line as following bash script:
> 
> --- a/EmbeddedPkg/Library/VirtualRealTimeClockLib/VirtualRealTimeClockLib.inf
> +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Library/VirtualRealTimeClockLib/VirtualRealTimeClockLib.inf
> @@ -34,4 +34,4 @@
>   
>   # Current usage of this library expects GCC in a UNIX-like shell environment with the date command
>   [BuildOptions]
> -  GCC:*_*_*_CC_FLAGS = -DBUILD_EPOCH=`date +%s`
> +  GCC:*_*_*_CC_FLAGS = -DBUILD_EPOCH=`printenv SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH || date +%s`^M

This looks fine.

If I was to guess, from looking at the PR, I would say PatchCheck.py is 
unhappy over the merge commit that has been introduced.
If you rebase your change on top of current master branch and force push 
an update, that will trigger a new CI run, which I'm thinking would pass.

Best Regards,

Leif

> 
> This change works on openSUSE/SLE, and it also passed
> PlatformCI_ArmVirtPkg_Ubuntu_GCC5_PR test.
> 
> My question is:
> What's the platform of "Azure Pipelines/tianocore.PatchCheck" ? Is it a
> virtual machine? Where can I find the platform for debugging my change?
> 
> Thank a lot!
> Joey Lee
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#119756): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/119756
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/106995552/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-02 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-02  6:42 [edk2-devel] How do debug tianocore.PatchCheck failed? joeyli via groups.io
2024-07-02 10:32 ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2024-07-02 13:38   ` joeyli via groups.io

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff9c0d85-540f-4cae-807e-57d01426e0fa@quicinc.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox