From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lersek@redhat.com>
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom;
 client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com;
 receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org 
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36690208AE375
 for <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 06:23:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C10212456D;
 Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:23:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-122-135.rdu2.redhat.com
 [10.10.122.135])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28DE5C5E0;
 Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:23:07 +0000 (UTC)
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
 Jeremiah Cox <jerecox@microsoft.com>
Cc: stephano <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>,
 "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
 "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
References: <bc0dcd1a-e63e-488e-11dd-ac53109deea0@linux.intel.com>
 <DM5PR2101MB09361FF2447DFE2D7FA64E58AD680@DM5PR2101MB0936.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAKv+Gu9s89QLh59sAf6DhDWCCExZmLNt8uSCCdETXmHNrTDPRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <DM5PR2101MB0936ACC1AC5B0A443893CCD4AD670@DM5PR2101MB0936.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAKv+Gu8DLRj_7p=JrK9J=hKL_zEvkRd840-MUyQcVSWosrhkEg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <ffb30238-12b2-f4c0-b1ca-a5036b1b7bf8@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:23:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu8DLRj_7p=JrK9J=hKL_zEvkRd840-MUyQcVSWosrhkEg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:23:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [edk2-announce] Community Meeting Minutes
X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EDK II Development  <edk2-devel.lists.01.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/options/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:23:10 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Just a short comment below.

(Not changing my stance in any way that I've presented thus far; the
comment is only meant in addition to / as a clarification for that.)

On 02/15/19 09:43, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

> I would like to see more engagement from these contributors in the
> actual project before we start rebuilding our infrastructure around
> them.

Agreed. In my opinion, some public "testimonials" would be nice, such as

  Yes, the mailing list based workflow is the one thing that prevents us
  from sharing patches, listening to and addressing reviews, posting
  updated patches, and commenting on others' patches.

Thanks,
Laszlo