From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.6916.1612439922526331138
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Thu, 04 Feb 2021 03:58:42 -0800
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Buyh34eP;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 216.205.24.124, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1612439921;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=vBS4+srKuNPimiswtM9tlrIjq0iUPxzha58tTMUiGJI=;
	b=Buyh34ePPkzy7mXCQ75DKIZgp4yCjnjAUZSoZYvVznkE8Bz5Rm4QxER21PStSibguyaxit
	ce7TMpUwUiX88/oaK7susW2788Bqp79ebzcDJp1YuJlxy/0oZJxaPAqcWoTNwEa7MoyC+h
	F9jsFIBV3pFrpRRCepdn/86VOmLvkpg=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-53-cM7zmyJGO0mONBKQPwpL1Q-1; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 06:58:39 -0500
X-MC-Unique: cM7zmyJGO0mONBKQPwpL1Q-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87BA3835E23;
	Thu,  4 Feb 2021 11:58:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-114-169.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.169])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6836062F;
	Thu,  4 Feb 2021 11:58:37 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Use XADD to avoid lock acquire/release
To: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
 "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>, "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>, "Kumar, Rahul1"
 <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
References: <20210204025921.1428-1-ray.ni@intel.com>
 <20210204025921.1428-3-ray.ni@intel.com>
 <DM6PR11MB4058DAD357C1FBD5E9EC27E1E3B39@DM6PR11MB4058.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <ffc6cf45-ac93-ab89-4aea-139d6686225f@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 12:58:36 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB4058DAD357C1FBD5E9EC27E1E3B39@DM6PR11MB4058.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
	auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=lersek@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 02/04/21 12:24, Zeng, Star wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Do you think it worth or not to also update MpFuncs.nasm in Edk2\UefiCpuPkg\PiSmmCpuDxeSmm?

I haven't done any measurements, so I couldn't say...