From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>, Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 02/11] OvmfPkg: add ShellLibs.dsc.inc
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 14:59:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jvb4jkcodg24toexn4z6wzo4u7nxc2btdl53szgl2xu6qeebre@wbxfmsrdqvqe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53e77c3c-86ad-b3fb-9474-0a4a7cdcb80f@redhat.com>
Hi,
> My preferred style is observed for example in:
>
> - NetworkPkg/NetworkLibs.dsc.inc
> - RedfishPkg/RedfishLibs.dsc.inc
>
> Alas, it is not observed in:
>
> - MdePkg/MdeLibs.dsc.inc
> - OvmfPkg/Include/Dsc/OvmfTpmLibs.dsc.inc
>
> At least, from the last two, OvmfTpmLibs.dsc.inc has an excuse: it
> provides library class resolutions for different module types.
Which is why I did it that way for TPM. A single include file is enough
instead of having multiple include files for multiple module types. The
OvmfPkg/Include/Dsc/OvmfTpmLibs.dsc.inc is placed in a location where
this works without problems, and I've placed the new shell include at
the same location.
I also have a WIP patch series (need to undust and rebase it ...) doing
the same for the crypto stuff, and that has the same problem the TPM
include has: We have different configurations for PEI (stripped down
config, with only the hash functions for measurements) and DXE (full
TLS support). And it is a single file with multiple sections too ...
tl;dr: I prefer the with-sections style.
> (2) This change makes the ShellCEntryLib resolution dependent on
> BUILD_SHELL, which is a functional change, and it is not justified,
> AFAICT.
> (2.1) "Bare bones" is for example
> "MdeModulePkg/Application/SmiHandlerProfileInfo/SmiHandlerProfileInfo.inf".
> [ ... ]
> (2.2) shell app is for example
> "OvmfPkg/EnrollDefaultKeys/EnrollDefaultKeys.inf".
> [ ... ]
Thanks for all this background info, much appreciated.
> Our BUILD_SHELL macro controls whether we build the shell itself, but
> that is independent of whether we build applications that require the
> shell to launch them. Making the ShellCEntryLib class resolution
> dependent on BUILD_SHELL would only be valid if we also built all the
> shell applications dependent on the BUILD_SHELL macro -- which is not
> the case.
Given that EnrollDefaultKeys depends on the shell to launch
I'm wondering whenever we should just change that and make the
EnrollDefaultKeys build depend on BUILD_SHELL (and also move it
into Shell*.inc) ?
take care,
Gerd
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#114613): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/114613
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103935344/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-26 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 16:37 [edk2-devel] [PATCH 00/11] OvmfPkg: tweak shell builds Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-24 16:37 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 01/11] OvmfPkg: add ShellComponents.dsc.inc Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-25 11:49 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-24 16:37 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 02/11] OvmfPkg: add ShellLibs.dsc.inc Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-25 13:14 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-26 13:59 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2024-01-29 11:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-29 12:25 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-29 12:40 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-24 16:37 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 03/11] OvmfPkg: add ShellDxe.fdf.inc Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-25 13:21 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-24 16:37 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 04/11] OvmfPkg: Shell*.inc: allow building without network support Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-25 13:53 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-24 16:37 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 05/11] OvmfPkg: ShellDxe.fdf.inc: add VariablePolicyDynamicCommand to FV Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-25 16:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-24 16:37 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 06/11] OvmfPkg: switch OvmfPkgIa32 to new shell include files Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-25 16:56 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-24 16:37 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 07/11] OvmfPkg: switch OvmfPkgIa32X64 " Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-25 16:57 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-24 16:37 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 08/11] OvmfPkg: switch AmdSevX64 " Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-25 17:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-14 14:24 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-24 16:38 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 09/11] OvmfPkg: switch IntelTdxX64 " Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-25 17:04 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-24 16:38 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 10/11] OvmfPkg: switch MicrovmX64 " Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-25 17:05 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-24 16:38 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 11/11] OvmfPkg/CI: copy shell to virtual drive Gerd Hoffmann
2024-01-25 17:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-25 3:09 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 00/11] OvmfPkg: tweak shell builds Yao, Jiewen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jvb4jkcodg24toexn4z6wzo4u7nxc2btdl53szgl2xu6qeebre@wbxfmsrdqvqe \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox