From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Spell check corrections, package by package To: devel@edk2.groups.io From: brbarkel@microsoft.com X-Originating-Location: Seattle, Washington, US (174.21.79.155) X-Originating-Platform: Windows Chrome 89 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:24:23 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BACoRv9x6JOIgCHXtykz" --BACoRv9x6JOIgCHXtykz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When we added the SpellCheck to CI, we intended to move through package by = package and turn on the PR gate checks (right now they're all in "audit onl= y"). To do this, we must first fix all the existing spelling errors and/or = update the ignore lists and dictionaries with expected terms. I would like to start this process so that we can get enforcement on in th= e next couple of months. To pick a random package, I was going to start wit= h NetworkPkg. Before starting, I wanted to ask what the community would lik= e to see in terms of the number of patches and/or associated bugs. I'm comf= ortable with whatever because I will likely automate the bug opening and pa= tch association (so beware if you want one bug per fix... there will be a L= OT of bugs). Thoughts? --BACoRv9x6JOIgCHXtykz Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When we added the SpellCheck to CI, we intended to move through package by = package and turn on the PR gate checks (right now they're all in "audit onl= y"). To do this, we must first fix all the existing spelling errors and/or = update the ignore lists and dictionaries with expected terms.

I = would like to start this process so that we can get enforcement on in the n= ext couple of months. To pick a random package, I was going to start with N= etworkPkg. Before starting, I wanted to ask what the community would like t= o see in terms of the number of patches and/or associated bugs. I'm comfort= able with whatever because I will likely automate the bug opening and patch= association (so beware if you want one bug per fix... there will be a LOT = of bugs).

Thoughts? --BACoRv9x6JOIgCHXtykz--