From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.50363.1681723467625075820
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Mon, 17 Apr 2023 02:24:27 -0700
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ABKKsqK8;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 170.10.129.124, mailfrom: kraxel@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1681723466;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=LauUgBV5oek7lvR+iiyuR8ZQdKCpajMN3lfDEatGWsw=;
	b=ABKKsqK8eT1EkvUhnZMBF9eaozlDbH91TLacm8UCUM+cE5lYBPdegvxcVnoZBeO3QPWl8o
	tJbZ1r9g8iKnWP3Q9WUm6q4SxDSWqyRcYnbPJ8jaidxxiQepYpOyDPuFp/IKNmRaCErSjE
	biySB6ZGDiQqyPbyAOMG4q+/em40RJw=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com
 [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-255-0L0j2CjdNle2IgyQavoS2w-1; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 05:24:23 -0400
X-MC-Unique: 0L0j2CjdNle2IgyQavoS2w-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AFBF280A337;
	Mon, 17 Apr 2023 09:24:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (unknown [10.39.193.149])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C2A91415304;
	Mon, 17 Apr 2023 09:24:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C41C718000B3; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:24:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:24:21 +0200
From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>, 
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Strange behavior between GCC 11 and GCC 12
Message-ID: <xistf7wxjdtwtuskzblgx6scexdwdmmugdqb5w6l6rtdgzkrnd@mrwxuw6lcyvr>
References: <7f0f5f8e-09c7-4ae4-ffca-1a7c322949a8@amd.com>
 <653323a0-67d9-f896-83fe-46cf207fc83d@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <653323a0-67d9-f896-83fe-46cf207fc83d@amd.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.7
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 04:39:23PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 4/14/23 15:23, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > I've been trying to debug a problem I'm seeing when I moved to the GCC 12
> > compiler. Under SEV it results in the guest crashing.
> 
> False alarm, I was on the wrong branch that does not have ff36b2550f94
> ("OvmfPkg/Sec: fix stack switch")... disregard.

FYI: You need 129404f6e439 too.

HTH,
  Gerd